Assays of CFTR Function In Vitro, Ex Vivo and In Vivo.

CF Research Lab, Woman and Child Unit, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven (Catholic University of Leuven), B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Pulmonology, University Hospital of Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. Molecular Virology and Gene Therapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven (Catholic University of Leuven), B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), Department CHROMETA, KU Leuven (Catholic University of Leuven), B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.

International journal of molecular sciences. 2022;(3)
Full text from:

Abstract

Cystic fibrosis, a multi-organ genetic disease, is characterized by abnormal function of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, a chloride channel at the apical membrane of several epithelia. In recent years, therapeutic strategies have been developed to correct the CFTR defect. To evaluate CFTR function at baseline for diagnosis, or the efficacy of CFTR-restoring therapy, reliable tests are needed to measure CFTR function, in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo. In vitro techniques either directly or indirectly measure ion fluxes; direct measurement of ion fluxes and quenching of fluorescence in cell-based assays, change in transmembrane voltage or current in patch clamp or Ussing chamber, swelling of CFTR-containing organoids by secondary water influx upon CFTR activation. Several cell or tissue types can be used. Ex vivo and in vivo assays similarly evaluate current (intestinal current measurement) and membrane potential differences (nasal potential difference), on tissues from individual patients. In the sweat test, the most frequently used in vivo evaluation of CFTR function, chloride concentration or stimulated sweat rate can be directly measured. Here, we will describe the currently available bio-assays for quantitative evaluation of CFTR function, their indications, advantages and disadvantages, and correlation with clinical outcome measures.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Review

Metadata