Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Latin American Perspective.

Pulmonary Division-Heart Institute (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. Haematology Department, British Hospital of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Servicio de Hematología, Hospital Universitario "Dr José E González", Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Mexico. Hematology Department, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico. Cancer Unit, Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe, Medellín, Colombia. Unit of Angiology, 28130Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Vascular Medicine and Thrombosis Service, Instituto Universitario de Ciencias Biomedicas de Córdoba (IUCBC), Córdoba, Argentina. Clinical Oncology Unit, Clínica del Country, Bogotá, Colombia. Thoracic Oncology Service, 5803Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Medical Oncology, Centro de Investigación y Manejo del Cáncer (CIMCA), San José, Costa Rica. Department of Haematological Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London, UK.

Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. 2022;:10760296221082988
Full text from:

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. On the basis of results from randomized controlled trials, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are now recommended for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE. The decision to use a DOAC requires consideration of bleeding risk, particularly in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, the cost-benefit and convenience of oral therapy, and patient preference. While efficacy with apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban versus dalteparin has been consistent in the treatment of cancer-associated VTE, heterogeneity is evident with respect to major GI bleeding, with an increased risk with edoxaban and rivaroxaban but not apixaban. Although cost and accessibility vary in different countries of Latin America, DOACs should be considered for the long-term treatment of cancer-associated VTE in all patients who are likely to benefit. Apixaban may be the preferred DOAC in patients with GI malignancies and LMWH may be preferred for patients with upper or unresected lower GI tumors. Vitamin K antagonists should only be used for anticoagulation when DOACs and low molecular weight heparin are inaccessible or unsuitable.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Review

Metadata

MeSH terms : Anticoagulants ; Neoplasms