0
selected
-
1.
Effects of a gluten-free diet on gut microbiota and immune function in healthy adult humans.
Sanz, Y
Gut microbes. 2021;1(3):135-7
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The composition of gut bacteria is greatly influenced by diet composition, particularly complex carbohydrates. Currently for patients with coeliac disease, the only therapy is to adhere to a strict gluten-free diet (GFD), which naturally reduces intake of these complex carbohydrates. The aim of this preliminary study was to assess the nutritional quality of the GFD through modifications on the composition and immune properties of the gut microbiota. 10 healthy subjects followed a GFD for one month and faecal microbiota was analysed. This study showed that inflammatory markers were significantly reduced, however the number of healthy gut bacteria also decreased. Based on these findings, the author concluded that a GFD does not lead to complete normalisation of the gut microbiota, and supports the consideration to promote polysaccharide and probiotic intake in treated coeliac disease patients.
Abstract
Diet is a major environmental factor influencing gut microbiota diversity and functionality, which might be relevant to subjects following dietary therapies. Celiac disease (CD) is an enteropathy caused by an aberrant immune response to cereal gluten proteins and the only therapy is the adherence to a gluten-free diet (GFD). In this context, a preliminary study was conducted to establish whether the GFD in itself could modify the composition and immune properties of the gut microbiota. The trial included 10 healthy subjects (30.3 years-old), which were submitted to a GFD over one month. Analysis of fecal microbiota and dietary intake indicated that numbers of healthy gut bacteria decreased, while numbers of unhealthy bacteria increased parallel to reductions in the intake of polysaccharides after following the GFD. Fecal samples of subjects under a GFD, which represent an altered microbiota, also exerted lower immune stimulatory effects on peripheral blood mononuclear cells than those of subjects on a regular gluten-containing diet. This addendum presents further discussion on the rationale behind these findings, limitations of the study and possible consequences of dietary counselling in the care process of celiac disease patients.
-
2.
Serum Levels of Vitamin C and Vitamin D in a Cohort of Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients of a North American Community Hospital Intensive Care Unit in May 2020: A Pilot Study.
Arvinte, C, Singh, M, Marik, PE
Medicine in drug discovery. 2020;8:100064
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The emergence of the Covid-19 pandemic has necessitated the research of novel ways to decrease infection risk and severity of the disease. Recent research has implicated vitamin C and vitamin D levels as possible indicators for susceptibility to Covid-19 and as nutrient therapies in those who have already contracted the disease. This pilot observational cohort study aimed to measure serum vitamin C and vitamin D levels in patients with Covid-19. 21 critically ill Covid-19 patients were enrolled into the study, of which 11 survived. Serum vitamin C and vitamin D levels were collected as part of routine testing. The results showed that the Covid-19 patients in this study had low vitamin C, D2 and D3 levels but it is unclear whether these were significant, due to the small number of people in the study. Age was a significant predictor for death from Covid-19 and for every increase of 10 years, risk of death increased by nearly 3-fold, which was partly attributed to low vitamin C levels. However low vitamin C levels or age alone were not predictors for mortality. It was concluded that low vitamin C and D levels were detected in this cohort of Covid-19 patients and that age and vitamin C levels combined contributed to mortality risk, however many more hypotheses were generated. Clinicians could use this study to help further understand the importance of monitoring vitamin C and D levels in someone with Covid-19.
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has placed an enormous and growing burden on the population and health infrastructure, warranting innovative ways to mitigate risk of contracting and developing severe forms of this disease. A growing body of literature raises the issue of vitamin C and vitamin D as a risk-assessment tool, and therapeutic option, in COVID-19. Objective: The objective of this pilot study was to measure serum vitamin C and vitamin D levels in a cohort of patients with critical COVID-19 illness in our community hospital ICU, correlate with other illness risk factors (age, BMI, HgbA1c, smoking status), generate hypotheses, and suggest further therapeutic intervention studies. Method: This pilot study included all 21 critically ill COVID-19 patients hospitalized in May 2020 in the ICU of North Suburban Medical Center, Thornton, Colorado, in whose care the principal investigator (C.A.) was involved. We measured patients' serum vitamin C and vitamin D levels, and standard risk factors like age, BMI, HbA1c, and smoking status. Variables in this study were gauged using descriptive statistics. Results: Of 21 critically ill COVID-19 patients (15 males and 6 females, 17 Hispanic and 4 Caucasian, of median age 61 years, range 20-94), there were 11 survivors.Serum levels of vitamin C and vitamin D were low in most of our critically ill COVID-19 ICU patients.Older age and low vitamin C level appeared co-dependent risk factors for mortality from COVID-19 in our sample.Insulin resistance and obesity were prevalent in our small cohort, but smoking was not. Conclusion: Our pilot study found low serum levels of vitamin C and vitamin D in most of our critically ill COVID-19 ICU patients. Older age and low vitamin C level appeared co-dependent risk factors for mortality. Many were also insulin-resistant or diabetic, overweight or obese, known as independent risk factors for low vitamin C and vitamin D levels, and for COVID-19.These findings suggest the need to further explore whether caring for COVID-19 patients ought to routinely include measuring and correcting serum vitamin C and vitamin D levels, and whether treating critically ill COVID-19 warrants acute parenteral vitamin C and vitamin D replacement.
-
3.
COVID-19 and diabetes: The why, the what and the how.
Cuschieri, S, Grech, S
Journal of diabetes and its complications. 2020;34(9):107637
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Early reports have shown that individuals with diabetes who contract Covid-19 have higher hospital admissions and mortality rates, classing them as a vulnerable group. This review paper aimed to explain why this group of people are vulnerable and what measures could be recommended. The paper outlined that individuals with diabetes have a compromised immune system due to uncontrolled blood sugar levels. In addition to this, individuals with diabetes and Covid-19 may have a higher risk of organ damage due to the effects of the body's immune response combined with the disordered biological processes associated with their pre-existing condition. Conversely, it was discussed that Covid-19 could exacerbate diabetes progression if the Covid-19 virus entered the cells of the pancreas, causing a blood sugar imbalance. As a result, the importance of optimal blood sugar control was outlined. Several medications were addressed and their benefits/disadvantages discussed. Amongst those reviewed were medications such as GLP-1 agonists, which may help with controlling blood sugar levels and may prevent Covid-19 entering the body's own cells, and metformin, which was initially developed as an anti-influenza drug. Finally the paper discussed diabetes specific precautions to avoid contracting Covid-19. Vitamin D supplementation, regular blood sugar checks, lifestyle measures such as exercise and dietary requirements and allowing individuals with diabetes to have large supplies of their medications to avoid leaving the house were discussed. It was concluded that during the Covid-19 pandemic, individuals with diabetes require particular care in order to avoid additional burden on healthcare systems. For those individuals with diabetes who haven’t contracted Covid-19, this paper could be used to recommend any extra precautions to take to avoid contracting this virus.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has taken the world by storm. Alongside COVID-19, diabetes is a long-standing global epidemic. The diabetes population has been reported to suffer adverse outcomes if infected by COVID-19. The aim was to summarise information and resources available on diabetes and COVID-19, highlighting special measures that individuals with diabetes need to follow. METHODS A search using keywords "COVID-19" and "Diabetes" was performed using different sources, including PubMed and World Health Organization. RESULTS COVID-19 may enhance complications in individuals with diabetes through an imbalance in angiotension-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) activation pathways leading to an inflammatory response. ACE2 imbalance in the pancreas causes acute β-cell dysfunction and a resultant hyperglycemic state. These individuals may be prone to worsened COVID-19 complications including vasculopathy, coagulopathy as well as psychological stress. Apart from general preventive measures, remaining hydrated, monitoring blood glucose regularly and monitoring ketone bodies in urine if on insulin is essential. All this while concurrently maintaining physical activity and a healthy diet. Different supporting entities are being set up to help this population. CONCLUSION COVID-19 is a top priority. It is important to remember that a substantial proportion of the world's population is affected by other co-morbidities such as diabetes. These require special attention during this pandemic to avoid adding on to the burden of countries' healthcare systems.
-
4.
Vitamin C may reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients: a meta-regression analysis.
Hemilä, H, Chalker, E
Journal of intensive care. 2020;8:15
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Whilst 100mg vitamin C per day may be sufficient to maintain normal plasma vitamin C levels in healthy people, critically ill patients appear to have a much greater need for vitamin C. A previous meta-analysis showed that vitamin C supplementation shortened the stay in intensive care units (ICU) by 7.8% and duration of mechanical ventilation by 18%. The extent to which vitamin C shortened need for ventilation varied greatly between studies and appeared to depend on duration of ventilation in the control group which reflects the severity of illness in the study population. The aim of this study was to confirm this theory by analysing the relationship between the effect of vitamin C in the treatment group and the duration of mechanical ventilation in the control group, as a proxy for the severity of the disease. Nine trials with 975 patients overall were included in the analysis. Vitamin C was administered either orally or intravenously and dosages ranged between 1-6g per day for all but one trial which used 90g per day. Severity of illness at baseline varied greatly between studies, with a 250-fold variation of length of mechanical ventilation. The analysis confirmed that when duration of ventilation was less than 10 hours there was no meaningful benefit from vitamin C whilst there was a 31% decrease in duration of mechanical ventilation when durations were longer than 100 hours, reflecting the severity of the illnesses included in the studies. The study with the highest dose of vitamin C saw the largest effects but the authors attributed this to the fact that this study had the sickest patient population rather than to the high dose of vitamin C.
Abstract
Background: Our recent meta-analysis indicated that vitamin C may shorten the length of ICU stay and the duration of mechanical ventilation. Here we analyze modification of the vitamin C effect on ventilation time, by the control group ventilation time (which we used as a proxy for severity of disease in the patients of each trial). Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and reference lists of relevant publications. We included controlled trials in which the administration of vitamin C was the only difference between the study groups. We did not limit our search to randomized trials and did not require placebo control. We included all doses and all durations of vitamin C administration. One author extracted study characteristics and outcomes from the trial reports and entered the data in a spreadsheet. Both authors checked the data entered against the original reports. We used meta-regression to examine whether the vitamin C effect on ventilation time depends on the duration of ventilation in the control group. Results: We identified nine potentially eligible trials, eight of which were included in the meta-analysis. We pooled the results of the eight trials, including 685 patients in total, and found that vitamin C shortened the length of mechanical ventilation on average by 14% ( = 0.00001). However, there was significant heterogeneity in the effect of vitamin C between the trials. Heterogeneity was fully explained by the ventilation time in the untreated control group. Vitamin C was most beneficial for patients with the longest ventilation, corresponding to the most severely ill patients. In five trials including 471 patients requiring ventilation for over 10 h, a dosage of 1-6 g/day of vitamin C shortened ventilation time on average by 25% ( < 0.0001). Conclusions: We found strong evidence that vitamin C shortens the duration of mechanical ventilation, but the magnitude of the effect seems to depend on the duration of ventilation in the untreated control group. The level of baseline illness severity should be considered in further research. Different doses should be compared directly in future trials.
-
5.
Quarantine during COVID-19 outbreak: Changes in diet and physical activity increase the risk of cardiovascular disease.
Mattioli, AV, Sciomer, S, Cocchi, C, Maffei, S, Gallina, S
Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD. 2020;30(9):1409-1417
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Current quarantine measures aim to reduce transmission of Covid-19 to prevent deaths and ensure healthcare systems do not become overwhelmed. However the long term effects of quarantine can have negative consequences on an individual’s health. Stress, increased heart related diseases and affected mental health have all been implicated as outcomes of extended quarantine. This review paper aimed to assess the impact of quarantine on lifestyle factors such as nutrition, physical activity and the role of technology in a Covid-19 adapting world. The paper outlines that quarantine may increase chronic stress, which activates certain nervous and hormonal systems, resulting in adverse affects on the heart. However physical data on this in relation to quarantine is lacking. Quarantine can also lead to changes in lifestyle habits, such as an increased intake of sugar-rich food, alcohol and a decrease in physical activity, which may be maintained after quarantine has lifted in response to economic crisis. Stress related eating, the availability of fresh foods and restricted shop opening hours were implicated as reasons why many people switch to unhealthy eating habits. Prevention of Covid-19 through the use of vitamin D was discussed, due to its ability to protect against infection and inflammation, especially in those who are deficient. Preventative measures to quarantine related stress and reducing the risk of heart related diseases were also highlighted through staying physically active and healthy eating strategies. The paper concluded that after the Covid-19 pandemic it is likely that there will be an increase in heart related diseases. Clinicians could use this paper to encourage healthy eating and exercise in patients who have heart related diseases or to decrease the risk of heart related diseases in patients who are suffering from stress as a direct result of quarantine.
Abstract
AIMS: CoV-19/SARS-CoV-2 is a highly pathogenic virus that is causing a global pandemic with a high number of deaths and infected people. To contain the diffusion of infection, several governments have enforced restrictions on outdoor activities or even collective quarantine on the population. The present commentary briefly analyzes the effects of quarantine on lifestyle, including nutrition and physical activity and the impact of new technologies in dealing with this situation. DATA SYNTHESIS Quarantine is associated with stress and depression leading to unhealthy diet and reduced physical activity. A diet poor in fruit and vegetables is frequent during isolation, with a consequent low intake of antioxidants and vitamins. However, vitamins have recently been identified as a principal weapon in the fight against the Cov-19 virus. Some reports suggest that Vitamin D could exert a protective effect on such infection. During quarantine, strategies to further increase home-based physical activity and to encourage adherence to a healthy diet should be implemented. The WHO has just released guidance for people in self-quarantine, those without any symptoms or diagnosis of acute respiratory illness, which provides practical advice on how to stay active and reduce sedentary behavior while at home. CONCLUSION Quarantine carries some long-term effects on cardiovascular disease, mainly related to unhealthy lifestyle and anxiety. Following quarantine, a global action supporting healthy diet and physical activity is mandatory to encourage people to return to a good lifestyle routine.
-
6.
Reanalysis of the Effect of Vitamin C on Mortality in the CITRIS-ALI Trial: Important Findings Dismissed in the Trial Report.
Hemilä, H, Chalker, E
Frontiers in medicine. 2020;7:590853
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
This article is a re-analysis of data from a clinical trial into the effects of intravenous vitamin C on organ failure and biomarkers of inflammation and vascular injury in patients with sepsis and severe acute respiratory failure. The authors of this critique argue that the way the results were presented in the original paper is misleading. In particular, they criticise the focus on biomarkers, rather than important clinical outcomes. Apparently, whilst many of the biomarkers showed no significant improvements, vitamin C significantly improved three out of four clinically important outcomes: ICU-free days, hospital-free days, and mortality, but not ventilator-free days. The authors also point out a number of flaws in study design, for example, mortality follow-up was 28 days although vitamin C was only given for four days, and apparently data showed significantly better outcomes whilst patients received vitamin C. Overall, the authors of this critique conclude that the effect of vitamin C on mortality in this study is not equal to placebo as suggested by the authors of the original paper, but that vitamin C causes an 81% reduction in mortality which is similar to that shown in other clinical studies.
-
7.
Unusual Early Recovery of a Critical COVID-19 Patient After Administration of Intravenous Vitamin C.
Waqas Khan, HM, Parikh, N, Megala, SM, Predeteanu, GS
The American journal of case reports. 2020;21:e925521
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Coronavirus disease (Covid-19) continues to spread globally and to date there are no proven treatments. Current treatment focuses on the management of the associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). There are many studies demonstrating that in severe sepsis and ARDS; Vitamin C reduces systemic inflammation, prevents lung damage, reduces the duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay in patients. This is a case report where a critically ill patient received high-dose Vitamin C intravenous (IV) infusions and recovered. A 74 year-old woman with Covid-19, developed ARDS and septic shock. Usual medications were given. She needed MV and deteriorated rapidly. On Day 7 she was administered Vitamin C (11g per 24 hours as a continuous IV infusion). Her clinical condition improved slowly after this. In this case, high dose IV Vitamin C was associated with fewer days on mechanical intervention, a shorter ICU stay and earlier recovery. These results show the importance of further investigation of IV Vitamin C to assess its efficacy in critically ill Covid-19 patients requiring mechanical ventilation and ICU care.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to spread, with confirmed cases now in more than 200 countries. Thus far there are no proven therapeutic options to treat COVID-19. We report a case of COVID-19 with acute respiratory distress syndrome who was treated with high-dose vitamin C infusion and was the first case to have early recovery from the disease at our institute. CASE REPORT A 74-year-old woman with no recent sick contacts or travel history presented with fever, cough, and shortness of breath. Her vital signs were normal except for oxygen saturation of 87% and bilateral rhonchi on lung auscultation. Chest radiography revealed air space opacity in the right upper lobe, suspicious for pneumonia. A nasopharyngeal swab for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 came back positive while the patient was in the airborne-isolation unit. Laboratory data showed lymphopenia and elevated lactate dehydrogenase, ferritin, and interleukin-6. The patient was initially started on oral hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. On day 6, she developed ARDS and septic shock, for which mechanical ventilation and pressor support were started, along with infusion of high-dose intravenous vitamin C. The patient improved clinically and was able to be taken off mechanical ventilation within 5 days. CONCLUSIONS This report highlights the potential benefits of high-dose intravenous vitamin C in critically ill COVID-19 patients in terms of rapid recovery and shortened length of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay. Further studies will elaborate on the efficacy of intravenous vitamin C in critically ill COVID-19.
-
8.
The Emerging Role of Vitamin C in the Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19.
Carr, AC, Rowe, S
Nutrients. 2020;12(11)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
There are many parallels between the clinical presentations of pneumonia and sepsis with the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). This has enabled researchers to draw on decades of research and apply it the current pandemic. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the potential role of Vitamin C in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 based on existing research. Examining the current literature, the authors found many therapeutic properties of vitamin C applicable to the clinical presentations of COVID-19. These include modulating the immune system, decreasing inflammation and lessening complications in the lungs. Emerging research indicates that administering vitamin C early during respiratory infection may prevent its progression to sepsis, thus reducing organ failure. Additionally, a recent observational study has found low vitamin C status in critically ill patients with COVID-19, and numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are currently assessing intravenous vitamin C in patients with COVID-19. Based on the current research, the authors warrant administering vitamin C to patients with low vitamin C levels and severe respiratory infections while optimistically awaiting results from current RCTs.
Abstract
Investigation into the role of vitamin C in the prevention and treatment of pneumonia and sepsis has been underway for many decades. This research has laid a strong foundation for translation of these findings into patients with severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Research has indicated that patients with pneumonia and sepsis have low vitamin C status and elevated oxidative stress. Administration of vitamin C to patients with pneumonia can decrease the severity and duration of the disease. Critically ill patients with sepsis require intravenous administration of gram amounts of the vitamin to normalize plasma levels, an intervention that some studies suggest reduces mortality. The vitamin has pleiotropic physiological functions, many of which are relevant to COVID-19. These include its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic and immuno-modulatory functions. Preliminary observational studies indicate low vitamin C status in critically ill patients with COVID-19. There are currently a number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) registered globally that are assessing intravenous vitamin C monotherapy in patients with COVID-19. Since hypovitaminosis C and deficiency are common in low-middle-income settings, and many of the risk factors for vitamin C deficiency overlap with COVID-19 risk factors, it is possible that trials carried out in populations with chronic hypovitaminosis C may show greater efficacy. This is particularly relevant for the global research effort since COVID-19 is disproportionately affecting low-middle-income countries and low-income groups globally. One small trial from China has finished early and the findings are currently under peer review. There was significantly decreased mortality in the more severely ill patients who received vitamin C intervention. The upcoming findings from the larger RCTs currently underway will provide more definitive evidence. Optimization of the intervention protocols in future trials, e.g., earlier and sustained administration, is warranted to potentially improve its efficacy. Due to the excellent safety profile, low cost, and potential for rapid upscaling of production, administration of vitamin C to patients with hypovitaminosis C and severe respiratory infections, e.g., COVID-19, appears warranted.
-
9.
The Effects of Low-Energy Moderate-Carbohydrate (MCD) and Mixed (MixD) Diets on Serum Lipid Profiles and Body Composition in Middle-Aged Men: A Randomized Controlled Parallel-Group Clinical Trial.
Michalczyk, MM, Maszczyk, A, Stastny, P
International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020;17(4)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Diets high in poor quality carbohydrates and fats and low in fibre are believed to play an integral role in the formation of many different chronic diseases. Calorie restricted diets have previously shown to have health benefits, but these are stringent and hard to maintain. More recently low-carbohydrate diets have shown that they may be better tolerated. This randomised control trial aimed to compare a calorie restricted diet (MixD) with a calorie restricted moderate-carbohydrate diet (MCD) on indicators for chronic disease in 60 overweight and obese men over four weeks. The results showed that MCD resulted in significant loss of body fat without loss of muscle mass compared to MixD and significantly decreased markers for heart disease risk. It was concluded that the amount of body fat can be attributed to the amount and quality of carbohydrates consumed and that consumption of a MCD is more effective for weight loss without compromising muscle mass than a MixD. This study could be used by health professionals to recommend a MCD to middle aged obese men in order to lose body fat, retain muscle mass and reduce their risk of heart disease.
Abstract
undefined: Carbohydrate-restricted diets have become very popular due to their numerous health benefits. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of 4 weeks of a well-planned, low-energy moderate-carbohydrate diet (MCD) and a low-energy mixed diet (MixD) on the lipoprotein profile, glucose and C-reactive protein concentrations, body mass, and body composition in middle-aged males. Sixty middle-aged males were randomly assigned to the following groups: hypocaloric MCD (32% carbohydrates, 28% proteins, and 40% fat), hypocaloric MixD (50% carbohydrates, 20% proteins, and 30% fat), and a conventional (control) diet (CD; 48% carbohydrates, 15% proteins, and 37% fat). The participants who were classified into the MCD and MixD groups consumed 20% fewer calories daily than the total daily energy expenditure (TDEE). Baseline and postintervention fasting triacylglycerol (TG), LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol (LDL-C), HDL (high-density lipoprotein) cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (tCh), glucose (Gl), and C-reactive protein were evaluated. Body mass (BM) and body composition changes, including body fat (BF), % body fat (PBF), and muscle mass (MM), were monitored. Compared with MixD and CD, MCD significantly changed the fasting serum concentrations of TG ( < 0.05), HDL-C ( < 0.05), LDL-C ( < 0.05), tCh ( < 0.05), and glucose ( < 0.01). Additionally, body fat content (kg and %) was significantly reduced ( < 0.05) after MCD compared with MixD and CD. After the MixD intervention, BM and MM decreased ( < 0.05) compared with baseline values. Compared with baseline, after the MixD, BM, MM, tCh, LDL-C, and TG changed significantly. The 4 week low-energy MCD intervention changed lipoproteins, glucose, and body fat to a greater extent than the low-energy MixD. A hypocaloric MCD may be suggested for middle-aged male subjects who want to lose weight by reducing body fat content without compromising muscle mass.
-
10.
Vitamin C levels in patients with SARS-CoV-2-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Chiscano-Camón, L, Ruiz-Rodriguez, JC, Ruiz-Sanmartin, A, Roca, O, Ferrer, R
Critical care (London, England). 2020;24(1):522
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Sepsis related acute respiratory disease (ARDS) is associated with Covid-19. ARDS patients can present with decreased levels of vitamin C and so by association Covid-19 patients may also have low vitamin C levels. In this cohort study, 18 Covid-19 ARDS patients of which all survived were assessed for vitamin C levels. 17 patients had undetectable levels of vitamin C and one had low levels. It was concluded that more than 90% of the patients in this study had undetectable levels of vitamin C, which may be due to several reasons, such as reduced absorption of vitamin C in the gut and decreased production. Clinicians could use this study to understand the importance of monitoring vitamin C levels in patients with Covid-19.