-
1.
Administration of parenteral nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia: a population level observational study using routinely collected data held in the National Neonatal Research Database.
Gale, C, Jeyakumaran, D, Longford, N, Battersby, C, Ojha, S, Oughham, K, Dorling, J
Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition. 2021;(6):608-613
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Parenteral nutrition is commonly administered during therapeutic hypothermia. Randomised trials in critically ill children indicate that parenteral nutrition may be harmful. OBJECTIVE To examine the association between parenteral nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia and clinically important outcomes. DESIGN Retrospective, population-based cohort study using the National Neonatal Research Database; propensity scores were used to create matched groups for comparison. SETTING National Health Service neonatal units in England, Scotland and Wales. PARTICIPANTS 6030 term and near-term babies, born 1/1/2010 and 31/12/2017, who received therapeutic hypothermia; 2480 babies in the matched analysis. EXPOSURE We compared babies that received any parenteral nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia with babies that did not. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome: blood culture confirmed late-onset infection; secondary outcomes: treatment for late onset infection, necrotising enterocolitis, survival, length of stay, measures of breast feeding, hypoglycaemia, central line days, time to full enteral feeds, discharge weight. RESULTS 1475/6030 babies (25%) received parenteral nutrition. In comparative matched analyses, the rate of culture positive late onset infection was higher in babies that received parenteral nutrition (0.3% vs 0.9%; difference 0.6; 95% CI 0.1, 1.2; p=0.03), but treatment for presumed infection was not (difference 0.8%, 95% CI -2.1 to 3.6, p=0.61). Survival was higher in babies that received parenteral nutrition (93.1% vs 90.0%; rate difference 3.1, 95% CI 1.5, 4.7; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Receipt of parenteral nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia is associated with higher late-onset infection but lower mortality. This finding may be explained by residual confounding. Research should address the risks and benefits of parenteral nutrition in this population.
-
2.
Efficacy of Docosahexaenoic Acid for the Prevention of Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Bernabe-García, M, Calder, PC, Villegas-Silva, R, Rodríguez-Cruz, M, Chávez-Sánchez, L, Cruz-Reynoso, L, Mateos-Sánchez, L, Lara-Flores, G, Aguilera-Joaquín, AR, Sánchez-García, L
Nutrients. 2021;(2)
Abstract
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is an inflammatory bowel disease and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. In this study, a randomized double-blind parallel-group (1:1) trial was carried out in two neonatal intensive care units of two tertiary hospitals. Two hundred and twenty-five preterm newborns with an expected functional gastrointestinal tract were recruited and received an enteral dose of 75 mg of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)/kg body weight or high-oleic sunflower oil daily for 14 days from the first enteral feed after birth. Confirmed NEC was evaluated with Bell's scale from stage ≥ IIa. Two hundred and fourteen randomized infants were analyzed in terms of the intent-to-treat (DHA-group: n = 105; control-group: n = 109); data for two hundred infants were analysed per protocol. Confirmed NEC was lower in infants from the DHA-group compared with the control-group (0/100 vs. 7/100; p = 0.007), with RR = 0.93 (95% CI 0.881 to 0.981), risk difference = -7%, (95% CI -12.00 to -1.99), and number needed-to-treat = 15 (95% CI 8.3 to 50). Intent-to-treat analysis showed a lower level of treatment failure in the DHA-group compared with the control-group (6/105 (6%) vs. 16/109 (15%); p = 0.03, RR = 0.905, (95% CI 0.826 to 0.991)). The results after multivariate-regression analysis remained significant. Adverse events (apart from the incidence of NEC) were not different between groups. A daily dose of DHA for 14 days starting with the first enteral feed may prevent NEC in preterm infants.
-
3.
Prenatal Immunity and Influences on Necrotizing Enterocolitis and Associated Neonatal Disorders.
Sampah, MES, Hackam, DJ
Frontiers in immunology. 2021;:650709
Abstract
Prior to birth, the neonate has limited exposure to pathogens. The transition from the intra-uterine to the postnatal environment initiates a series of complex interactions between the newborn host and a variety of potential pathogens that persist over the first few weeks of life. This transition is particularly complex in the case of the premature and very low birth weight infant, who may be susceptible to many disorders as a result of an immature and underdeveloped immune system. Chief amongst these disorders is necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), an acute inflammatory disorder that leads to necrosis of the intestine, and which can affect multiple systems and have the potential to result in long term effects if the infant is to survive. Here, we examine what is known about the interplay of the immune system with the maternal uterine environment, microbes, nutritional and other factors in the pathogenesis of neonatal pathologies such as NEC, while also taking into consideration the effects on the long-term health of affected children.
-
4.
ELFIN, the United Kingdom preterm lactoferrin trial: interpretation and future questions 1.
Berrington, JE, McGuire, W, Embleton, ND
Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire. 2021;(1):1-6
Abstract
Results from previous studies have suggested that supplemental bovine lactoferrin (BLF) given to preterm infants (<32 weeks gestation) reduces late-onset sepsis (LOS) and necrotising enterocolitis (NEC). The Enteral Lactoferrin in Neonates (ELFIN) study, performed in the UK, aimed to further address this issue with a well powered double-blind placebo controlled trial of >2200 preterm infants. The results from ELFIN did not demonstrate a reduction in LOS or NEC, or several other clinically important measures. Of the 1093 infants, 316 (29%) in the intervention group developed late-onset sepsis versus 334 (31%) of 1089 in the control group, with an adjusted risk ratio of 0.95 (95% CI = 0.86-1.04; p = 0.233). Reasons for the differences in ELFIN trial results and other studies may include population differences, the routine use of antifungal prophylaxis in the UK, timing of administration of the lactoferrin in relation to disease onset, or specific properties of the lactoferrin used in the different trials. The UK National Institutes for Health Research funded "Mechanisms Affecting the Guts of Preterm Infants in Enteral feeding trials" (MAGPIE) study is further exploring the use of lactoferrin, and the results should be available soon.
-
5.
Challenges of a simplified opt-out consent process in a neonatal randomised controlled trial: qualitative study of parents' and health professionals' views and experiences.
McLeish, J, Alderdice, F, Robberts, H, Cole, C, Dorling, J, Gale, C, ,
Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition. 2021;(3):244-250
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND More effective recruitment strategies like alternative approaches to consent are needed to facilitate adequately powered trials. Witholding Enteral feeds Around Transfusion was a multicentre, randomised, pilot trial that compared withholding and continuing feeds around transfusion. The primary clinical outcome was necrotising enterocolitis. The trial used simplified opt-out consent with concise parent information and no consent form. OBJECTIVE To explore the views and experiences of parents and health professionals on the acceptability and feasibility of opt-out consent in randomised comparative effectiveness trials. METHODS A qualitative, descriptive interview-based study nested within a randomised trial. Semistructured interview transcripts were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. SETTING Eleven neonatal units in England. PARTICIPANTS Eleven parents and ten health professionals with experience of simplified consent. RESULTS Five themes emerged: 'opt-out consent operationalised as verbal opt-in consent', 'opt-out consent normalises participation while preserving parental choice', 'opt-out consent as an ongoing process of informed choice', 'consent without a consent form' and 'choosing to opt out of a comparative effectiveness trial', with two subthemes: 'wanting "normal care"' and 'a belief that feeding is better'. CONCLUSION Introducing a novel form of consent proved challenging in practice. The principle of a simplified, opt-out approach to consent was generally considered feasible and acceptable by health professionals for a neonatal comparative effectiveness trial. The priority for parents was having the right to decide about trial participation, and they did not see opt-out consent as undermining this. Describing a study as 'opt-out' can help to normalise participation and emphasise that parents can withdraw consent.
-
6.
Probiotics for Preventing Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Preterm Infants: A Network Meta-Analysis.
Beghetti, I, Panizza, D, Lenzi, J, Gori, D, Martini, S, Corvaglia, L, Aceti, A
Nutrients. 2021;(1)
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent evidence supports a role of probiotics in preventing necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in preterm infants. METHODS A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the role of probiotics in preventing NEC in preterm infants, focusing on the differential effect of type of feeding, was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A random-effects model was used; a subgroup analysis on exclusively human milk (HM)-fed infants vs. infants receiving formula (alone or with HM) was performed. RESULTS Fifty-one trials were included (10,664 infants, 29 probiotic interventions); 31 studies (19 different probiotic regimens) were suitable for subgroup analysis according to feeding. In the overall analysis, Lactobacillus acidophilus LB revealed the most promising effect for reducing NEC risk (odds ratio (OR), 0.03; 95% credible intervals (CrIs), 0.00-0.21). The subgroup analysis showed that Bifidobacterium lactis Bb-12/B94 was associated with a reduced risk of NEC stage ≥2 in both feeding type populations, with a discrepancy in the relative effect size in favour of exclusively HM-fed infants (OR 0.04; 95% CrIs <0.01-0.49 vs. OR 0.32; 95% CrIs 0.10-0.36). CONCLUSIONS B. lactis Bb-12/B94 could reduce NEC risk with a different size effect according to feeding type. Of note, most probiotic strains are evaluated in few trials and relatively small populations, and outcome data according to feeding type are not available for all RCTs. Further trials are needed to confirm the present findings.
-
7.
Necrotizing enterocolitis in the preterm: newborns medical and nutritional Management in a Single-Center Study.
Savarino, G, Carta, M, Cimador, M, Corsello, A, Giuffrè, M, Schierz, IAM, Serra, G, Corsello, G
Italian journal of pediatrics. 2021;(1):226
Abstract
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a typical disorder of preterm newborns, with a high mortality and morbidity rate. The therapeutic and nutritional management of disease depends on several factors. Its prognosis is linked, in addition to the severity of the disease and the need for surgery, to a correct enteral feeding in these patients. This study aims to identify the clinical characteristics of 18 patients with NEC, evaluating the different therapeutic paths undertaken, the type of formula used and the survival rate of this population. Average time of enteral nutrition before the NEC onset was 11,3 ± 11,6 days, with an average fasting period since the onset of 24 ± 18.9 days. 77.8% of patients received surgery and resumed enteral nutrition 17.7 ± 17.9 days after the intervention. The overall survival rate of our cohort was 55.5%. More prospective studies are needed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of survived children with NEC.
-
8.
Human Milk Growth Factors and Their Role in NEC Prevention: A Narrative Review.
York, DJ, Smazal, AL, Robinson, DT, De Plaen, IG
Nutrients. 2021;(11)
Abstract
Growing evidence demonstrates human milk's protective effect against necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Human milk derives these properties from biologically active compounds that influence intestinal growth, barrier function, microvascular development, and immunological maturation. Among these protective compounds are growth factors that are secreted into milk with relatively high concentrations during the early postnatal period, when newborns are most susceptible to NEC. This paper reviews the current knowledge on human milk growth factors and their mechanisms of action relevant to NEC prevention. It will also discuss the stability of these growth factors with human milk pasteurization and their potential for use as supplements to infant formulas with the goal of preventing NEC.
-
9.
Strategies to increase the use of mother's own milk for infants at risk of necrotizing enterocolitis.
Patel, AL, Meier, PP, Canvasser, J
Pediatric research. 2020;(Suppl 1):21-24
Abstract
High-dose mother's own milk (MOM) feedings during the first 14 days post birth reduce the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birthweight (VLBW; <1500 g birthweight). However, high-dose MOM feedings are only possible if mothers provide sufficient quantities of MOM in a timely manner, and data indicate that the lack of MOM during the early post-birth period is a global problem. This paper reviews the modifiable and unmodifiable barriers to accessing adequate quantities of MOM during the early post-birth period and proposes evidence-based strategies to increase and improve the use of MOM during the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) hospitalization with an emphasis on the critical first 2 weeks post birth.
-
10.
Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus for preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in very-low-birth-weight preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jiao, X, Fu, MD, Wang, YY, Xue, J, Zhang, Y
World journal of pediatrics : WJP. 2020;(2):135-142
Abstract
BACKGROUND The therapeutic effect of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus on necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in very-low-birth-weight preterm infants was controversial, and we aimed to explore the exact impact of the two probiotics. METHODS The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published from January 1, 2010 to February 28, 2019. Results were combined with fixed-effect model or random-effect model with specific conditions. Sensitivity analysis was conducted by the trim-and-fill method, and the Begger's and Egger's test were used to measure publication bias. RESULTS The meta-analysis included 16 original articles with 4632 very-low-birth-weight preterm infants. With respect to the intervention of Bifidobacterium, we estimated non-significant decrease in the morbidity of NEC with a risk ratio (RR) of 0.75 [95% confidence internal (CI) 0.56-1.01, P = 0.06]. Regarding the effect of Lactobacillus, there was no evidence of significant lower risk in the incidence of NEC (RR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.39-1.17, P = 0.16). The use of mixture of probiotics (Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus) reduced the risk of NEC in the probiotics group (RR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.25-0.80, P = 0.007). CONCLUSION The mixture of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus could prevent the morbidity of NEC in very-low-birth-weight preterm infants. But Bifidobacterium or Lactobacillus alone did not show this effect.