-
1.
SARS-CoV-2 effects on sperm parameters: a meta-analysis study.
Xie, Y, Mirzaei, M, Kahrizi, MS, Shabestari, AM, Riahi, SM, Farsimadan, M, Roviello, G
Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics. 2022;39(7):1555-1563
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Infertility is a reproductive system disorder. Viruses as a major cause of fertility problems can potentially interfere with reproductive function in men. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was found to be the causing viral pathogen of COVID-19 and capable of affecting human health. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of SARS-CoV-2 on different semen parameters including sperm count, sperm concentration, volume, motility, and progressive motility. This study is a meta-analysis of twelve studies of which seven were case control studies and five were retrospective cohort studies. Results show that SARS-CoV-2 infection could lead to significant impairments of male reproductive function through exerting negative influences on different semen parameters namely semen volume, sperm concentration, sperm count, and sperm motility. Authors conclude that their findings revealed the vulnerability of semen quality to SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Abstract
AIM: The rapid outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic posed challenges across different medical fields, especially reproductive health, and gave rise to concerns regarding the effects of SARS-CoV-2 on male infertility, owing to the fact that the male reproductive system indicated to be extremely vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Only a small number of studies have investigated the effects of SARS-CoV-2 on male reproduction, but the results are not consistent. So, we performed this meta-analysis to draw a clearer picture and evaluate the impacts of COVID-19 on male reproductive system. METHOD We searched Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases to identify the potentially relevant studies. Standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was applied to assess the relationship. Heterogeneity testing, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias testing were also performed. RESULTS A total of twelve studies including 7 case control investigations and 5 retrospective cohort studies were found relevant and chosen for our research. Our result showed that different sperm parameters including semen volume [SMD = - 0.27 (- 0.46, - 1.48) (p = 0.00)], sperm concentration [SMD = - 0.41 (- 0.67, - 0.15) (p = 0.002)], sperm count [SMD = - 0.30 (- 0.44, - 0.17) (p = 0.00)], sperm motility [SMD = - 0.66 (- 0.98, - 0.33) (p = 0.00)], and progressive motility [SMD = - 0.35 (- 0.61, - 0.08) (p = 0.01)] were negatively influenced by SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, sperm concentration (p = 0.07) and progressive motility (p = 0.61) were not found to be significantly associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in case control studies. No publication bias was detected. CONCLUSION The present study revealed the vulnerability of semen quality to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our data showed a strong association of different sperm parameters with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The results suggested that SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients may negatively influence their fertility potential in a short-term period, but more studies are needed to decide about the long-term effects.
-
2.
A Systematic Review of the Impact of the First Year of COVID-19 on Obesity Risk Factors: A Pandemic Fueling a Pandemic?
Daniels, NF, Burrin, C, Chan, T, Fusco, F
Current developments in nutrition. 2022;6(4):nzac011
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is one of the most serious infectious disease outbreaks in recent history. Among the factors that can increase the risk of obesity, some seem to play a more prominent role than others such as depression, emotional eating, sedentary lifestyle and the socioeconomic status. The aim of this study was to explore the indirect effects of the first year of COVID-19 on obesity and its risk factors. This study is a systematic review of 87 studies with over 350,000 participants. Results show that: - overall, there was a general trend of weight gain during the pandemic. - there were differences in dietary changes, with some studies showing an improvement in diet. - some beneficial effects were observed in the dieting domain, such as higher consumption of home-cooked meals and healthy food (e.g., vegetables). However, there was an increasing trend in the overall food and alcohol consumption. - financial hardship and job loss were unavoidable consequences of the pandemic lockdown. However, although the impact of the countermeasures used to curb the COVID-19 pandemic was evident on obesity risk factors, none of the studies included in the research explored the direct impact of the risk factors on obesity itself. Authors conclude by pointing out the need for future research that aims at strengthening the link between stressful circumstances and a rise in risk factors for obesity and weight gain.
Abstract
Obesity is increasingly prevalent worldwide. Associated risk factors, including depression, socioeconomic stress, poor diet, and lack of physical activity, have all been impacted by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This systematic review aims to explore the indirect effects of the first year of COVID-19 on obesity and its risk factors. A literature search of PubMed and EMBASE was performed from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020 to identify relevant studies pertaining to the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic (PROSPERO; CRD42020219433). All English-language studies on weight change and key obesity risk factors (psychosocial and socioeconomic health) during the COVID-19 pandemic were considered for inclusion. Of 805 full-text articles that were reviewed, 87 were included for analysis. The included studies observed increased food and alcohol consumption, increased sedentary time, worsening depressive symptoms, and increased financial stress. Overall, these results suggest that COVID-19 has exacerbated the current risk factors for obesity and is likely to worsen obesity rates in the near future. Future studies, and policy makers, will need to carefully consider their interdependency to develop effective interventions able to mitigate the obesity pandemic.
-
3.
COVID-19 and chronic fatigue syndrome: Is the worst yet to come?
Wostyn, P
Medical hypotheses. 2021;146:110469
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
A proportion of COVID-19 patients develop post-COVID-19 syndrome, with long-term symptoms such as persistent fatigue, muscle pains, depressive symptoms, and non-restorative sleep, similar to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). In this article the author presents his medical hypothesis that, in a subset of patients at least, post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome may result from damage to olfactory (smell) sensory neurons, which in turn may lead to toxic build-up within the central nervous system (CNS) through congestion of the glymphatic system (the waste clearance system of the CNS). Loss of smell and altered sensation of taste have been reported in 33–80% of COVID-19 patients but the underlying mechanisms are not yet known. Most of these patients regain their sense of smell within 1-3 weeks, suggesting that the virus does not affect the olfactory neurons but their surrounding supporting cells. Some patients, however, do not regain their sense of smell for months which may point to the destruction of neurons. A decrease in olfactory neurons may affect the flow of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in an area important for CSF drainage. This may cause an increase in intracranial pressure (idiopathic intracranial hypertension, IIH) and congestion of the glymphatic system, which have been associated with chronic fatigue syndrome, as well as with headaches and tinnitus, symptoms also commonly seen in COVID-19 patients. The author states that if this hypothesis is confirmed, glymphatic-lymphatic drainage therapies, such as osteopathy, should be recommended as early treatment for patients with post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome.
Abstract
There has been concern about possible long-term sequelae resembling myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome in COVID-19 patients. Clarifying the mechanisms underlying such a "post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome" is essential for the development of preventive and early treatment methods for this syndrome. In the present paper, by integrating insights pertaining to the glymphatic system and the nasal cerebrospinal fluid outflow pathway with findings in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, and COVID-19, I provide a coherent conceptual framework for understanding the pathophysiology of post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome. According to this hypothesis, this syndrome may result from damage to olfactory sensory neurons, causing reduced outflow of cerebrospinal fluid through the cribriform plate, and further leading to congestion of the glymphatic system with subsequent toxic build-up within the central nervous system. I further postulate that patients with post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome may benefit from cerebrospinal fluid drainage by restoring glymphatic transport and waste removal from the brain. Obviously, further research is required to provide further evidence for the presence of this post-viral syndrome, and to provide additional insight regarding the relative contribution of the glymphatic-lymphatic system to it. Other mechanisms may also be involved. If confirmed, the glymphatic-lymphatic system could represent a target in combating post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome. Moreover, further research in this area could also provide new insights into the understanding of chronic fatigue syndrome.
-
4.
Role of mitochondria, oxidative stress and the response to antioxidants in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: A possible approach to SARS-CoV-2 'long-haulers'?
Wood, E, Hall, KH, Tate, W
Chronic diseases and translational medicine. 2021;7(1):14-26
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Cases of chronic fatigue have been reported following recovery from Covid-19, in what is termed ‘Long Covid’, with symptoms likened to that of sufferers from chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME). How CFS/ME develop and treatments may help to further understand Covid-19. This review study of 111 studies aimed to identify where urgent research is required to help understand the potential of chronic fatigue therapies in Covid-19. The study first reviewed disrupted cellular energy production in ME/CFS and increased presence of damaging oxidants. Current therapies for improving cellular energy production in CFS/ME were then reviewed and Ritalin, ubiquinone and mitoquinol mesylate were heavily featured. Antioxidant therapies in CFS/ME were reviewed and observations would suggest that trials in patients with long covid are needed. It was concluded that research in cellular energy production in CFS/ME has been increasing, however remains contradictory due to a lack of a definitive diagnosis, differing disease severity and the huge differences between patients who suffer from CFS/ME. Further research is required in ME/CFS and Covid-19. This study could be used by health care professionals to understand the importance of monitoring symptoms of fatigue post Covid-19 infection and the possible use of ME/CFS treatments.
Abstract
A significant number of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic patients have developed chronic symptoms lasting weeks or months which are very similar to those described for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. This study reviews the current literature and understanding of the role that mitochondria, oxidative stress and antioxidants may play in the understanding of the pathophysiology and treatment of chronic fatigue. It describes what is known about the dysfunctional pathways which can develop in mitochondria and their relationship to chronic fatigue. It also reviews what is known about oxidative stress and how this can be related to the pathophysiology of fatigue, as well as examining the potential for specific therapy directed at mitochondria for the treatment of chronic fatigue in the form of antioxidants. This study identifies areas which require urgent, further research in order to fully elucidate the clinical and therapeutic potential of these approaches.
-
5.
The neurological symptoms of COVID-19: a systematic overview of systematic reviews, comparison with other neurological conditions and implications for healthcare services.
Wildwing, T, Holt, N
Therapeutic advances in chronic disease. 2021;12:2040622320976979
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
COVID-19 has been found to cause neurological manifestations in up to 50% of patients. The aim of this study was to inform future service provision for those who develop long-term neurological symptoms due to COVID-19, as well as exploring the effect of COVID-19 on health professionals’ perceptions towards those with symptoms of functional neurological disorder (FND). This study is a systematic overview of current systematic reviews which included 45 studies in qualitative synthesis. Results show that: - COVID-19 appears to be becoming chronic for some patients, presenting similar neurological symptoms to FND and to chronic fatigue syndrome; - the long-term neurological effects of COVID-19 may impact neurological and wider health care services; - the neurological symptoms seen in COVID-19 may affect health professionals’ perceptions of FND and chronic fatigue syndrome. Authors conclude that there is increasing evidence of the presence of long-COVID symptoms persisting beyond 3 months. Further research is recommended to explore whether the neurological symptoms of COVID-19 will improve acceptance and understanding of FND, or whether this will worsen the experience for those who suffer from FND.
Abstract
AIMS: In response to the rapid spread of COVID-19, this paper provides health professionals with better accessibility to available evidence, summarising findings from a systematic overview of systematic reviews of the neurological symptoms seen in patients with COVID-19. Implications of so-called 'Long Covid' on neurological services and primary care and similarities with other neurological disorders are discussed. METHODS Firstly, a systematic overview of current reviews of neurological symptoms of COVID-19 was conducted. Secondly, the implications of these findings are discussed in relation to the potential effect on neurological services and the similarities in the experience of patients with COVID-19 and those with other neurological disorders. A total of 45 systematic reviews were identified within seven databases, published between 11 April 2020 and 15 October 2020, following a search in June 2020, updated on 20 October 2020. RESULTS The results indicated that COVID-19 exhibits two types of neurological symptoms; life-threatening symptoms such as Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) and encephalitis, and less devastating symptoms such as fatigue and myalgia. Many of these so-called lesser symptoms appear to be emerging as longer-term for some sufferers and have been recently labelled Long Covid. When compared, these less devastating symptoms are very similar to other neurological conditions such as chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and functional neurological disorder (FND). CONCLUSION Implications for neurological healthcare services in the United Kingdom (UK) may include longer waiting times and a need for more resources (including more qualified health professionals). There is also a possible change-effect on health professionals' perceptions of other neurological conditions such as CFS and FND. Future research is recommended to explore changes in health professionals' perceptions of neurological symptoms because of COVID-19.
-
6.
Historical Insight into Infections and Disorders Associated with Neurological and Psychiatric Sequelae Similar to Long COVID.
Stefano, GB
Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research. 2021;27:e931447
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Literature shows that there are long-term symptoms and organ damage in patients with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 that persist after the acute illness. The aim of this review was to present a historical overview of infections and disorders associated with the neurological and psychiatric sequelae that have shown similarities with long COVID. Historically, the common symptom of altered cognition has been reported during earlier pandemics. Pandemics discussed in this review include; influenza pandemics of 1889 and 1892 (Russian flu), Spanish flu pandemic (1918-1919), encephalitis lethargica, diphtheria, and myalgic encephalomyelitis (chronic fatigue syndrome or post-viral fatigue syndrome). Furthermore, literature shows that there are similarities between the symptoms of chronic fatigue syndrome and the brain fog of long COVID. Viral infection, cerebral hypoxia [reduced supply of oxygen to the brain), cognitive dysfunction, or brain fog may occur along a common pathway in the long-term pathogenesis of epidemic and pandemic infections, including COVID-19. Authors conclude that utilising data from past epidemics and pandemics may help to identify common acute and chronic syndromes, including neurological and psychiatric sequelae with similarities to the conditions currently described in patients with long COVID.
Abstract
Long-term sequelae of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are now recognized. However, there is still a lack of consensus regarding the terminology for this emerging chronic clinical syndrome, which includes long COVID, chronic COVID syndrome, post-COVID-19 syndrome, post-acute COVID-19, and long-hauler COVID-19. In this review, I will use the term "long COVID". A review of the medical history and epidemiology of past pandemics and epidemics in modern literature review identifies common long-term post-infectious disorders, with the common finding of altered cognition. In the brain, the cerebral hypoxia induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection may be caused by mitochondrial dysfunction, resulting in "brain fog". Historically, the common symptom of altered cognition has been reported during earlier pandemics, which include the influenza pandemics of 1889 and 1892 (Russian flu), the Spanish flu pandemic (1918-1919), encephalitis lethargica, diphtheria, and myalgic encephalomyelitis (chronic fatigue syndrome or post-viral fatigue syndrome). There are similarities between chronic fatigue syndrome and the "brain fog" described in long COVID. During past viral epidemics and pandemics, a commonality of neural targets may have increased viral survival by conformational matching. The neurological and psychiatric sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection, or long COVID, may have emerged from neural effects that have emerged from an invertebrate and vertebrate virosphere. This review aims to present a historical overview of infections and disorders associated with neurological and psychiatric sequelae that have shown similarities with long COVID.
-
7.
SARS-CoV-2 and immune-microbiome interactions: Lessons from respiratory viral infections.
Cyprian, F, Sohail, MU, Abdelhafez, I, Salman, S, Attique, Z, Kamareddine, L, Al-Asmakh, M
International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2021;105:540-550
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is an enveloped RNA beta-coronavirus. This virus caused the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The aim of this review was to investigate the relationship between microbiota, immunity, and COVID-19, with particular focus on how microbiome-associated immune crosstalk can shape outcome of COVID-19. The study included 118 articles which investigated or reviewed COVID-19 or coronavirus and the microbiome of the gut or respiratory tract. Findings indicate that: - an over-activated immune system leads to massive pulmonary damage in COVID-19 patients. - the effect of aging and comorbidities, and the use of antibiotics have an effect on the diversity of the microbiota. - the milieu of gut flora can exert influence on pulmonary immune responses. - a unique cross-talk exists between the pulmonary and gut microbial compartments. Authors conclude by highlighting the need of further studies that delineate the role of the microbiota and their products in the immune dysregulation observed in SARS-CoV-2 infections.
Abstract
By the beginning of 2020, infection caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) had rapidly evolved into an emergent worldwide pandemic, an outbreak whose unprecedented consequences highlighted many existing flaws within public healthcare systems across the world. While coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is bestowed with a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations, involving the vital organs, the respiratory system transpires as the main route of entry for SARS-CoV-2, with the lungs being its primary target. Of those infected, up to 20% require hospitalization on account of severity, while the majority of patients are either asymptomatic or exhibit mild symptoms. Exacerbation in the disease severity and complications of COVID-19 infection have been associated with multiple comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disorders, cancer, and chronic lung disease. Interestingly, a recent body of evidence indicated the pulmonary and gut microbiomes as potential modulators for altering the course of COVID-19, potentially via the microbiome-immune system axis. While the relative concordance between microbes and immunity has yet to be fully elucidated with regards to COVID-19, we present an overview of our current understanding of COVID-19-microbiome-immune cross talk and discuss the potential contributions of microbiome-related immunity to SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis and COVID-19 disease progression.
-
8.
Understanding Viral Infection Mechanisms and Patient Symptoms for the Development of COVID-19 Therapeutics.
Choi, HM, Moon, SY, Yang, HI, Kim, KS
International journal of molecular sciences. 2021;22(4)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The outbreak of a novel coronavirus was reported in Wuhan, in the Hubei province of China, in December 2019. This virus was officially designated as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) because of its phylogenetic and taxonomic similarities to other coronaviruses. The aim of this review was to understand the viral infection mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2, the clinical features of Covid-19 and the mechanisms through which Covid-19 can be effectively treated with existing drugs. Literature shows that: • SARS-CoV-2 is usually transmitted by inhalation or contact with infected droplets. Inhaled droplets or aerosol carrying the virus then infect and spread through the respiratory tracts. • Severe inflammatory response is a remarkable feature of Covid-19 symptoms. This is caused by delayed viral clearance, which induces chronic systemic inflammation and widespread tissue damage, even leading to cytokine storms. • The incubation period is generally 5-6 days, but it ranges from one day to as much as two weeks. • Interstitial pneumonia and subsequent acute respiratory distress syndrome are the leading causes of death in patients with Covid-19. • There is no licensed treatment for Covid-19, only a combination of antiviral and anti-inflammatory drug treatments are being used. Authors conclude that their finding may provide new insights into the development of therapeutics by understanding the various clinical and basic research studies currently underway.
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has become a worldwide pandemic. Symptoms range from mild fever to cough, fatigue, severe pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and organ failure, with a mortality rate of 2.2%. However, there are no licensed drugs or definitive treatment strategies for patients with severe COVID-19. Only antiviral or anti-inflammatory drugs are used as symptomatic treatments based on clinician experience. Basic medical researchers are also trying to develop COVID-19 therapeutics. However, there is limited systematic information about the pathogenesis of COVID-19 symptoms that cause tissue damage or death and the mechanisms by which the virus infects and replicates in cells. Here, we introduce recent knowledge of time course changes in viral titers, delayed virus clearance, and persistent systemic inflammation in patients with severe COVID-19. Based on the concept of drug reposition, we review which antiviral or anti-inflammatory drugs can effectively treat COVID-19 patients based on progressive symptoms and the mechanisms inhibiting virus infection and replication.
-
9.
Probiotics in Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19: Current Perspective and Future Prospects.
Kurian, SJ, Unnikrishnan, MK, Miraj, SS, Bagchi, D, Banerjee, M, Reddy, BS, Rodrigues, GS, Manu, MK, Saravu, K, Mukhopadhyay, C, et al
Archives of medical research. 2021;52(6):582-594
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The novel coronavirus pandemic of 2019 (COVID-19), an emerging infectious disease, is caused by multiple strains of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2. The main aim of this study was to outline the potential role of probiotics in fighting the COVID-19. This study focuses on recent evidence on the association between microbiota, probiotics, and COVID-19, the role of probiotics as an immune-modulator and antiviral agent. Findings support probiotics’ role in regulating the immune system, suggesting a definitive role for probiotics in viral infections. Thus, probiotics supplementation could reduce the severity of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. Authors conclude that supplementation of probiotics in high risk and severely ill patients, and frontline health workers, may help to limit the infection and flatten the COVID-19 curve. However, further studies should be conducted for more conclusive evidence.
Abstract
Saving lives and flattening the curve are the foremost priorities during the ongoing pandemic spread of SARS-CoV-2. Developing cutting-edge technology and collating available evidence would support frontline health teams. Nutritional adequacy improves general health and immunity to prevent and assuage infections. This review aims to outline the potential role of probiotics in fighting the COVID-19 by covering recent evidence on the association between microbiota, probiotics, and COVID-19, the role of probiotics as an immune-modulator and antiviral agent. The high basic reproduction number (R0) of SARS-CoV-2, absence of conclusive remedies, and the pleiotropic effect of probiotics in fighting influenza and other coronaviruses together favour probiotics supplements. However, further support from preclinical and clinical studies and reviews outlining the role of probiotics in COVID-19 are critical. Results are awaited from many ongoing clinical trials investigating the benefits of probiotics in COVID-19.
-
10.
Long COVID: An overview.
Raveendran, AV, Jayadevan, R, Sashidharan, S
Diabetes & metabolic syndrome. 2021;15(3):869-875
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) is a major pandemic resulting in considerable mortality and morbidity worldwide. For some people who recover from COVID-19, symptoms persist or new ones develop for weeks or months after infection despite testing PCR negative. This is termed long-COVID or post-COVID syndrome and divided into two stages: post-acute-COVID with symptoms extending beyond three weeks, and chronic-COVID with symptoms extending beyond 12 weeks. Factors that increase the risk for long-COVID include being female, age, having more than five symptoms in the acute stage of infection and pre-existing health conditions. A mild disease course is not exclusive to long-COVID. Typically affected by long-COVID are the pulmonary or cardiovascular system, with neuropsychiatric presentations also being reported. Common symptoms are one or more of the following such as fatigue, breathlessness, cough, chest pain, heart racing, headache, joint pain, muscle pain and weakness, insomnia, pins and needles, diarrhoea, rash, hair loss, impaired balance, neurocognitive issues. Due to the novelty of the virus, the underline pathophysiology of long-COVID still requires further investigation. Contributing factors mentioned include: compromised body functions after illness and inactivity, organ damage, persistent inflammation, altered immune response and auto-antibody generation and viral persistence. The impact of medication, treatments, hospitalisation or associated post-traumatic stress is also urged to be accounted for. Diagnosis of long-COVID is made by thorough history taking, clinical examination and the exclusion of other conditions. For the management of long-COVID, the authors in this review suggest the sub-categorisation depending on the body system most affected to optimize treatment options. Furthermore, it is encouraged that medical treatment should also consider the monitoring for worsening of any pre-existing health conditions post-infection. This review yields a informative summary of the definition, symptom presentations, risk factors, diagnosis and medical treatment options relating to long-COVID.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Long COVID is the collective term to denote persistence of symptoms in those who have recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS WE searched the pubmed and scopus databases for original articles and reviews. Based on the search result, in this review article we are analyzing various aspects of Long COVID. RESULTS Fatigue, cough, chest tightness, breathlessness, palpitations, myalgia and difficulty to focus are symptoms reported in long COVID. It could be related to organ damage, post viral syndrome, post-critical care syndrome and others. Clinical evaluation should focus on identifying the pathophysiology, followed by appropriate remedial measures. In people with symptoms suggestive of long COVID but without known history of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, serology may help confirm the diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS This review will helps the clinicians to manage various aspects of Long COVID.