-
1.
Novel insights into gene therapy in the cornea.
Mohan, RR, Martin, LM, Sinha, NR
Experimental eye research. 2021;:108361
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Corneal disease remains a leading cause of impaired vision world-wide, and advancements in gene therapy continue to develop with promising success to prevent, treat and cure blindness. Ideally, gene therapy requires a vector and gene delivery method that targets treatment of specific cells or tissues and results in a safe and non-immunogenic response. The cornea is a model tissue for gene therapy due to its ease of clinician access and immune-privileged state. Improvements in the past 5-10 years have begun to revolutionize the approach to gene therapy in the cornea with a focus on adeno-associated virus and nanoparticle delivery of single and combination gene therapies. In addition, the potential applications of gene editing (zinc finger nucleases [ZNFs], transcription activator-like effector nucleases [TALENs], Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/Associated Systems [CRISPR/Cas9]) are rapidly expanding. This review focuses on recent developments in gene therapy for corneal diseases, including promising multiple gene therapy, while outlining a practical approach to the development of such therapies and potential impediments to successful delivery of genes to the cornea.
-
2.
Durability of Voretigene Neparvovec for Biallelic RPE65-Mediated Inherited Retinal Disease: Phase 3 Results at 3 and 4 Years.
Maguire, AM, Russell, S, Chung, DC, Yu, ZF, Tillman, A, Drack, AV, Simonelli, F, Leroy, BP, Reape, KZ, High, KA, et al
Ophthalmology. 2021;(10):1460-1468
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether functional vision and visual function improvements after voretigene neparvovec (VN; Luxturna [Spark Therapeutics, Inc]) administration in patients with biallelic RPE65 mutation-associated inherited retinal disease are maintained at 3 to 4 years and to review safety outcomes. DESIGN Open-label, randomized, controlled phase 3 trial. PARTICIPANTS Thirty-one individuals were enrolled and randomized 2:1 to intervention (n = 21) or control (n = 10). One participant from each group withdrew before, or at, randomization. METHODS Patients in the original intervention (OI) group received bilateral subretinal VN injections. Delayed intervention (DI) patients served as control participants for 1 year then received VN. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Change from injection baseline in bilateral performance on the multiluminance mobility test (MLMT), a measure of ambulatory navigation, and change from injection baseline in full-field light sensitivity threshold white light, visual field (VF), and visual acuity (VA). RESULTS Mean bilateral MLMT change scores at year 4 for OI patients and year 3 for DI patients were 1.7 and 2.4, respectively, with 71% of patients with a year 3 visit able to pass MLMT at the lowest light level. Mean change in full-field light sensitivity threshold white light, averaged over both eyes at year 4 for OI patients and year 3 for DI patients, was -1.90 log10(cd.s/m2) and -2.91 log10(cd.s/m2), respectively. Mean change in Goldmann kinetic VF III4e sum total degrees, averaged across both eyes, was 197.7 at year 4 for OI patients and 157.9 at year 3 for DI patients. Mean change in VA (Holladay scale), averaged across both eyes, was -0.003 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) at year 4 for OI patients and -0.06 logMAR at year 3 for DI patients. One OI patient experienced retinal detachment at approximately year 4 that impacted VA for the OI group. No product-related serious adverse events (AEs) occurred, nor did any deleterious immune responses. CONCLUSIONS Improvements in ambulatory navigation, light sensitivity, and VF were consistent in both intervention groups. Overall, improvements were maintained up to 3 to 4 years, with ongoing observation. The safety profile of VN was consistent with vitrectomy and the subretinal injection procedure and was similar between intervention groups, with no product-related serious AEs reported.
-
3.
Efficacy, Safety, and Durability of Voretigene Neparvovec-rzyl in RPE65 Mutation-Associated Inherited Retinal Dystrophy: Results of Phase 1 and 3 Trials.
Maguire, AM, Russell, S, Wellman, JA, Chung, DC, Yu, ZF, Tillman, A, Wittes, J, Pappas, J, Elci, O, Marshall, KA, et al
Ophthalmology. 2019;(9):1273-1285
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the durability of voretigene neparvovec-rzyl (VN) adeno-associated viral vector-based gene therapy for RPE65 mutation-associated inherited retinal dystrophy (IRD), including results of a phase 1 follow-on study at year 4 and phase 3 study at year 2. DESIGN Open-label phase 1 follow-on clinical trial and open-label, randomized, controlled phase 3 clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS Forty subjects who received 1.5×1011 vector genomes (vg) of VN per eye in at least 1 eye during the trials, including 11 phase 1 follow-on subjects and 29 phase 3 subjects (20 original intervention [OI] and 9 control/intervention [CI]). METHODS Subretinal injection of VN in the second eye of phase 1 follow-on subjects and in both eyes of phase 3 subjects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES End points common to the phase 1 and phase 3 studies included change in performance on the Multi-Luminance Mobility Test (MLMT) within the illuminance range evaluated, full-field light sensitivity threshold (FST) testing, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Safety end points included adverse event reporting, ophthalmic examination, physical examination, and laboratory testing. RESULTS Mean (standard deviation) MLMT lux score change was 2.4 (1.3) at 4 years compared with 2.6 (1.6) at 1 year after administration in phase 1 follow-on subjects (n = 8), 1.9 (1.1) at 2 years, and 1.9 (1.0) at 1 year post-administration in OI subjects (n = 20), and 2.1 (1.6) at 1 year post-administration in CI subjects (n = 9). All 3 groups maintained an average improvement in FST, reflecting more than a 2 log10(cd.s/m2) improvement in light sensitivity at 1 year and subsequent available follow-up visits. The safety profile was consistent with vitrectomy and the subretinal injection procedure, and no deleterious immune responses occurred. CONCLUSIONS After VN gene augmentation therapy, there was a favorable benefit-to-risk profile with similar improvement demonstrated in navigational ability and light sensitivity among 3 groups of subjects with RPE65 mutation-associated IRD, a degenerative disease that progresses to complete blindness. The safety profile is consistent with the administration procedure. These data suggest that this effect, which is nearly maximal by 30 days after VN administration, is durable for 4 years, with observation ongoing.
-
4.
Targeting Alzheimer's disease with gene and cell therapies.
Loera-Valencia, R, Piras, A, Ismail, MAM, Manchanda, S, Eyjolfsdottir, H, Saido, TC, Johansson, J, Eriksdotter, M, Winblad, B, Nilsson, P
Journal of internal medicine. 2018;(1):2-36
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) causes dementia in both young and old people affecting more than 40 million people worldwide. The two neuropathological hallmarks of the disease, amyloid beta (Aβ) plaques and neurofibrillary tangles consisting of protein tau are considered the major contributors to the disease. However, a more complete picture reveals significant neurodegeneration and decreased cell survival, neuroinflammation, changes in protein and energy homeostasis and alterations in lipid and cholesterol metabolism. In addition, gene and cell therapies for severe neurodegenerative disorders have recently improved technically in terms of safety and efficiency and have translated to the clinic showing encouraging results. Here, we review broadly current data within the field for potential targets that could modify AD through gene and cell therapy strategies. We envision that not only Aβ will be targeted in a disease-modifying treatment strategy but rather that a combination of treatments, possibly at different intervention times may prove beneficial in curing this devastating disease. These include decreased tau pathology, neuronal growth factors to support neurons and modulation of neuroinflammation for an appropriate immune response. Furthermore, cell based therapies may represent potential strategies in the future.
-
5.
The therapeutic landscape of HIV-1 via genome editing.
Kwarteng, A, Ahuno, ST, Kwakye-Nuako, G
AIDS research and therapy. 2017;(1):32
Abstract
Current treatment for HIV-1 largely relies on chemotherapy through the administration of antiretroviral drugs. While the search for anti-HIV-1 vaccine remain elusive, the use of highly active antiretroviral therapies (HAART) have been far-reaching and has changed HIV-1 into a manageable chronic infection. There is compelling evidence, including several side-effects of ARTs, suggesting that eradication of HIV-1 cannot depend solely on antiretrovirals. Gene therapy, an expanding treatment strategy, using RNA interference (RNAi) and programmable nucleases such as meganuclease, zinc finger nuclease (ZFN), transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALEN), and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated proteins (CRISPR-Cas9) are transforming the therapeutic landscape of HIV-1. TALENS and ZFNS are structurally similar modular systems, which consist of a FokI endonuclease fused to custom-designed effector proteins but have been largely limited, particularly ZFNs, due to their complexity and cost of protein engineering. However, the newly developed CRISPR-Cas9 system, consists of a single guide RNA (sgRNA), which directs a Cas9 endonuclease to complementary target sites, and serves as a superior alternative to the previous protein-based systems. The techniques have been successfully applied to the development of better HIV-1 models, generation of protective mutations in endogenous/host cells, disruption of HIV-1 genomes and even reactivating latent viruses for better detection and clearance by host immune response. Here, we focus on gene editing-based HIV-1 treatment and research in addition to providing perspectives for refining these techniques.
-
6.
Efficacy and safety of voretigene neparvovec (AAV2-hRPE65v2) in patients with RPE65-mediated inherited retinal dystrophy: a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial.
Russell, S, Bennett, J, Wellman, JA, Chung, DC, Yu, ZF, Tillman, A, Wittes, J, Pappas, J, Elci, O, McCague, S, et al
Lancet (London, England). 2017;(10097):849-860
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Phase 1 studies have shown potential benefit of gene replacement in RPE65-mediated inherited retinal dystrophy. This phase 3 study assessed the efficacy and safety of voretigene neparvovec in participants whose inherited retinal dystrophy would otherwise progress to complete blindness. METHODS In this open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial done at two sites in the USA, individuals aged 3 years or older with, in each eye, best corrected visual acuity of 20/60 or worse, or visual field less than 20 degrees in any meridian, or both, with confirmed genetic diagnosis of biallelic RPE65 mutations, sufficient viable retina, and ability to perform standardised multi-luminance mobility testing (MLMT) within the luminance range evaluated, were eligible. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to intervention or control using a permuted block design, stratified by age (<10 years and ≥10 years) and baseline mobility testing passing level (pass at ≥125 lux vs <125 lux). Graders assessing primary outcome were masked to treatment group. Intervention was bilateral, subretinal injection of 1·5 × 1011 vector genomes of voretigene neparvovec in 0·3 mL total volume. The primary efficacy endpoint was 1-year change in MLMT performance, measuring functional vision at specified light levels. The intention-to-treat (ITT) and modified ITT populations were included in primary and safety analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00999609, and enrolment is complete. FINDINGS Between Nov 15, 2012, and Nov 21, 2013, 31 individuals were enrolled and randomly assigned to intervention (n=21) or control (n=10). One participant from each group withdrew after consent, before intervention, leaving an mITT population of 20 intervention and nine control participants. At 1 year, mean bilateral MLMT change score was 1·8 (SD 1·1) light levels in the intervention group versus 0·2 (1·0) in the control group (difference of 1·6, 95% CI 0·72-2·41, p=0·0013). 13 (65%) of 20 intervention participants, but no control participants, passed MLMT at the lowest luminance level tested (1 lux), demonstrating maximum possible improvement. No product-related serious adverse events or deleterious immune responses occurred. Two intervention participants, one with a pre-existing complex seizure disorder and another who experienced oral surgery complications, had serious adverse events unrelated to study participation. Most ocular events were mild in severity. INTERPRETATION Voretigene neparvovec gene replacement improved functional vision in RPE65-mediated inherited retinal dystrophy previously medically untreatable. FUNDING Spark Therapeutics.
-
7.
Gene therapy for muscular dystrophy: lessons learned and path forward.
Mendell, JR, Rodino-Klapac, L, Sahenk, Z, Malik, V, Kaspar, BK, Walker, CM, Clark, KR
Neuroscience letters. 2012;(2):90-9
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Our Translational Gene Therapy Center has used small molecules for exon skipping and mutation suppression and gene transfer to replace or provide surrogate genes as tools for molecular-based approaches for the treatment of muscular dystrophies. Exon skipping is targeted at the pre-mRNA level allowing one or more exons to be omitted to restore the reading frame. In Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD), clinical trials have been performed with two different oligomers, a 2'O-methyl-ribo-oligonucleoside-phosphorothioate (2'OMe) and a phosphorodiamidate morpholino (PMO). Both have demonstrated early evidence of efficacy. A second molecular approach involves suppression of stop codons to promote readthrough of the DMD gene. We have been able to establish proof of principle for mutation suppression using the aminoglycoside, gentamicin. A safer, orally administered, alternative agent referred to as Ataluren (PTC124) has been used in clinical trials and is currently under consideration for approval by the FDA. Using a gene therapy approach, we have completed two trials and have initiated a third. For DMD, we used a mini-dystrophin transferred in adeno-associated virus (AAV). In this trial an immune response was seen directed against transgene product, a quite unexpected outcome that will help guide further studies. For limb girdle muscular dystrophy 2D (alpha-sarcoglycan deficiency), the transgene was again transferred using AAV but in this study, a muscle specific creatine kinase promoter controlled gene expression that persisted for six months. A third gene therapy trial has been initiated with transfer of the follistatin gene in AAV directly to the quadriceps muscle. Two diseases with selective quadriceps muscle weakness are undergoing gene transfer including sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) and Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD). Increasing the size and strength of the muscle is the goal of this study. Most importantly, no adverse events have been encountered in any of these clinical trials.
-
8.
AAV2 gene therapy readministration in three adults with congenital blindness.
Bennett, J, Ashtari, M, Wellman, J, Marshall, KA, Cyckowski, LL, Chung, DC, McCague, S, Pierce, EA, Chen, Y, Bennicelli, JL, et al
Science translational medicine. 2012;(120):120ra15
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Demonstration of safe and stable reversal of blindness after a single unilateral subretinal injection of a recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) carrying the RPE65 gene (AAV2-hRPE65v2) prompted us to determine whether it was possible to obtain additional benefit through a second administration of the AAV vector to the contralateral eye. Readministration of vector to the second eye was carried out in three adults with Leber congenital amaurosis due to mutations in the RPE65 gene 1.7 to 3.3 years after they had received their initial subretinal injection of AAV2-hRPE65v2. Results (through 6 months) including evaluations of immune response, retinal and visual function testing, and functional magnetic resonance imaging indicate that readministration is both safe and efficacious after previous exposure to AAV2-hRPE65v2.
-
9.
Gene therapy: light is finally in the tunnel.
Cao, H, Molday, RS, Hu, J
Protein & cell. 2011;(12):973-89
Abstract
After two decades of ups and downs, gene therapy has recently achieved a milestone in treating patients with Leber's congenital amaurosis (LCA). LCA is a group of inherited blinding diseases with retinal degeneration and severe vision loss in early infancy. Mutations in several genes, including RPE65, cause the disease. Using adeno-associated virus as a vector, three independent teams of investigators have recently shown that RPE65 can be delivered to retinal pigment epithelial cells of LCA patients by subretinal injections resulting in clinical benefits without side effects. However, considering the whole field of gene therapy, there are still major obstacles to clinical applications for other diseases. These obstacles include innate and immune barriers to vector delivery, toxicity of vectors and the lack of sustained therapeutic gene expression. Therefore, new strategies are needed to overcome these hurdles for achieving safe and effective gene therapy. In this article, we shall review the major advancements over the past two decades and, using lung gene therapy as an example, discuss the current obstacles and possible solutions to provide a roadmap for future gene therapy research.
-
10.
Controlled release systems for DNA delivery.
Pannier, AK, Shea, LD
Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy. 2004;(1):19-26
Abstract
Adapting controlled release technologies to the delivery of DNA has the potential to overcome extracellular barriers that limit gene therapy. Controlled release systems can enhance gene delivery and increase the extent and duration of transgene expression relative to more traditional delivery methods (e.g., injection). These systems typically deliver vectors locally, which can avoid distribution to distant tissues, decrease toxicity to nontarget cells, and reduce the immune response to the vector. Delivery vehicles for controlled release are fabricated from natural and synthetic polymers, which function either by releasing the vector into the local tissue environment or by maintaining the vector at the polymer surface. Vector release or binding is regulated by the effective affinity of the vector for the polymer, which depends upon the strength of molecular interactions. These interactions occur through nonspecific binding based on vector and polymer composition or through the incorporation of complementary binding sites (e.g., biotin-avidin). This review examines the delivery of nonviral and viral vectors from natural and synthetic polymers and presents opportunities for continuing developments to increase their applicability.