1.
Gastrointestinal Manifestations of COVID-19: Impact on Nutrition Practices.
Aguila, EJT, Cua, IHY, Fontanilla, JAC, Yabut, VLM, Causing, MFP
Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2020;(5):800-805
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Although Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is primarily a respiratory disease, growing evidence shows that it can affect the digestive system and present with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. Various nutrition societies have recently published their guidelines in context of the pandemic, and several points emphasize the impact of these GI manifestations on nutrition therapy. In patients with COVID-19, the normal intestinal mucosa can be disrupted by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus, and this could result in GI symptoms and a compromise in nutrient absorption. Optimization of oral diet is still recommended. However, given the GI effects of COVID-19, a fraction of infected patients have poor appetite and would not be able to meet their nutrition goals with oral diet alone. For this at-risk group, which includes those who are critically ill, enteral nutrition is the preferred route to promote gut integrity and immune function. In carrying this out, nutrition support practices have been revised in such ways to mitigate viral transmission and adapt to the pandemic. All measures in the GI and nutrition care of patients are clustered to limit exposure of healthcare workers. Among patients admitted to intensive care units, a significant barrier is GI intolerance, and it appears to be exacerbated by significant GI involvement specific to the SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nevertheless, several countermeasures can be used to ease side effects. At the end of the spectrum in which intolerance persists, the threshold for switching to parenteral nutrition may need to be lowered.
2.
Impact of oral preoperative and perioperative immunonutrition on postoperative infection and mortality in patients undergoing cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.
Buzquurz, F, Bojesen, RD, Grube, C, Madsen, MT, Gögenur, I
BJS open. 2020;(5):764-775
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infectious complications occur in 4-22 per cent of patients undergoing surgical resection of malignant solid tumours. Improving the patient's immune system in relation to oncological surgery with immunonutrition may play an important role in reducing postoperative infections. A meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate the potential clinical benefits of immunonutrition on postoperative infections and 30-day mortality in patients undergoing oncological surgery. METHODS PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify eligible studies. Eligible studies had to include patients undergoing elective curative surgery for a solid malignant tumour and receiving immunonutrition orally before surgery, including patients who continued immunonutrition into the postoperative period. The main outcome was overall infectious complications; secondary outcomes were surgical-site infection (SSI) and 30-day mortality, described by relative risk (RR) with trial sequential analysis (TSA). Risk of bias was assessed according to Cochrane methodology. RESULTS Some 22 RCTs with 2159 participants were eligible for meta-analysis. Compared with the control group, immunonutrition reduced overall infectious complications (RR 0·58, 95 per cent c.i. 0·48 to 0·70; I2 = 7 per cent; TSA-adjusted 95 per cent c.i. 0·28 to 1·21) and SSI (RR 0·65, 95 per cent c.i. 0·50 to 0·85; I2 = 0 per cent; TSA-adjusted 95 per cent c.i. 0·21 to 2·04). Thirty-day mortality was not altered by immunonutrition (RR 0·69, 0·33 to 1·40; I2 = 0 per cent). CONCLUSION Immunonutrition reduced overall infectious complications, even after controlling for random error, and also reduced SSI. The quality of evidence was moderate, and mortality was not affected by immunonutrition (low quality). Oral immunonutrition merits consideration as a means of reducing overall infectious complications after cancer surgery.
3.
Hypermetabolism and Nutritional Support in Sepsis.
Alverdy, JC
Surgical infections. 2018;(2):163-167
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical metabolism has been a founding field of investigation in surgery without which the boundaries of critical care, trauma, and surgical oncology could not have advanced. Traditionally, understanding the shifts in electrolytes, carbohydrates, fats, and amino acids that could explain the rapidly evolving proteolysis after catabolic stress and tumor growth has been a major focus of research that led to our current approach to maintaining homeostasis over the course of major surgical intervention and injury. METHOD Review of the English-language literature. RESULTS With the emerging field of inflammation and the discovery of cytokines and chemokines, surgical metabolism has taken a second seat in the surgical research arena. Yet central to all patient management after injury is an understanding of how catabolic stress erodes vital organ function and how current approaches can support metabolism through the most physiologically stressful perturbations known to man, for which there is no evolutionary precedent. Although it is well accepted that unabated proteolysis is not a sustainable physiologic state, in the era of modern medicine, precisely how to manipulate the body nutritionally to drive a recovery-directed immune response remains highly debated. This review incorporates multiple lines of inquiry in surgical metabolism, with a particular focus on sepsis. CONCLUSION The changing landscape of previous paradigms in the field is discussed. Finally, how next-generation technology might spark renewed interest in this field among surgical investigators is considered.