-
1.
Unusual Early Recovery of a Critical COVID-19 Patient After Administration of Intravenous Vitamin C.
Waqas Khan, HM, Parikh, N, Megala, SM, Predeteanu, GS
The American journal of case reports. 2020;21:e925521
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Coronavirus disease (Covid-19) continues to spread globally and to date there are no proven treatments. Current treatment focuses on the management of the associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). There are many studies demonstrating that in severe sepsis and ARDS; Vitamin C reduces systemic inflammation, prevents lung damage, reduces the duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay in patients. This is a case report where a critically ill patient received high-dose Vitamin C intravenous (IV) infusions and recovered. A 74 year-old woman with Covid-19, developed ARDS and septic shock. Usual medications were given. She needed MV and deteriorated rapidly. On Day 7 she was administered Vitamin C (11g per 24 hours as a continuous IV infusion). Her clinical condition improved slowly after this. In this case, high dose IV Vitamin C was associated with fewer days on mechanical intervention, a shorter ICU stay and earlier recovery. These results show the importance of further investigation of IV Vitamin C to assess its efficacy in critically ill Covid-19 patients requiring mechanical ventilation and ICU care.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to spread, with confirmed cases now in more than 200 countries. Thus far there are no proven therapeutic options to treat COVID-19. We report a case of COVID-19 with acute respiratory distress syndrome who was treated with high-dose vitamin C infusion and was the first case to have early recovery from the disease at our institute. CASE REPORT A 74-year-old woman with no recent sick contacts or travel history presented with fever, cough, and shortness of breath. Her vital signs were normal except for oxygen saturation of 87% and bilateral rhonchi on lung auscultation. Chest radiography revealed air space opacity in the right upper lobe, suspicious for pneumonia. A nasopharyngeal swab for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 came back positive while the patient was in the airborne-isolation unit. Laboratory data showed lymphopenia and elevated lactate dehydrogenase, ferritin, and interleukin-6. The patient was initially started on oral hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. On day 6, she developed ARDS and septic shock, for which mechanical ventilation and pressor support were started, along with infusion of high-dose intravenous vitamin C. The patient improved clinically and was able to be taken off mechanical ventilation within 5 days. CONCLUSIONS This report highlights the potential benefits of high-dose intravenous vitamin C in critically ill COVID-19 patients in terms of rapid recovery and shortened length of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay. Further studies will elaborate on the efficacy of intravenous vitamin C in critically ill COVID-19.
-
2.
Vitamin C: an essential "stress hormone" during sepsis.
Marik, PE
Journal of thoracic disease. 2020;12(Suppl 1):S84-S88
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Most mammals can synthesise vitamin C, except humans, other primates and guinea pigs, who lost this ability through a mutation. It is estimated that goats produce 2-4g of vitamin C per day, but significantly more when stressed. Vitamin C is thought to play an important role in our stress response. This short review articles discusses the importance of vitamin C during stress, in particular the stress of sepsis. The adrenal glands, our “stress organs”, contain very high levels of vitamin C which is released when the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis (which deals with our response to stressors) is stimulated. In animals, there is an inverse relationship between vitamin C internal manufacture and cortisol release under stress: the less vitamin C an animal can produce, the more cortisol they release. A number of vitamin C’s biological actions including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, immune function, synthesis of the stress hormones adrenaline and noradrenaline and wound healing, may play an important role during a stress response. During sepsis vitamin C gets used up at alarming rate. Sepsis is a complex disease and vitamin C’s biological actions can affect many of the underlying pathophysiological processes. Preclinical and clinical studies have shown a beneficial effect of vitamin C in patients with sepsis and synergistic effects are seen with thiamine (vitamin B1), corticosteroids and antibiotics.
Abstract
The stress response is a preserved evolutionary response that functions to enhance the survival of the species. In mammals, the stress response is characterized by activation of the HPA axis and sympathoadrenal system (SAS) as well as the increased synthesis and secretion of vitamin C. Cortisol, catecholamines, and vitamin C act synergistically to increase hemodynamic reserve, maintain immune function and protect the host against excessive oxidant injury. Humans (and anthropoid apes) have lost the ability to synthesize vitamin C and therefore have an impaired stress response. The inability to produce vitamin C has serious implications in septic humans. Treatment with vitamin C appears to restore the stress response and improve the survival of stressed humans.
-
3.
Vitamin C levels in patients with SARS-CoV-2-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Chiscano-Camón, L, Ruiz-Rodriguez, JC, Ruiz-Sanmartin, A, Roca, O, Ferrer, R
Critical care (London, England). 2020;24(1):522
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Sepsis related acute respiratory disease (ARDS) is associated with Covid-19. ARDS patients can present with decreased levels of vitamin C and so by association Covid-19 patients may also have low vitamin C levels. In this cohort study, 18 Covid-19 ARDS patients of which all survived were assessed for vitamin C levels. 17 patients had undetectable levels of vitamin C and one had low levels. It was concluded that more than 90% of the patients in this study had undetectable levels of vitamin C, which may be due to several reasons, such as reduced absorption of vitamin C in the gut and decreased production. Clinicians could use this study to understand the importance of monitoring vitamin C levels in patients with Covid-19.
-
4.
Immediate and long-term consequences of COVID-19 infections for the development of neurological disease.
Heneka, MT, Golenbock, D, Latz, E, Morgan, D, Brown, R
Alzheimer's research & therapy. 2020;12(1):69
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Covid-19 may cause brain dysfunction evidenced by symptoms individuals experience once they have contracted the disease. Loss of smell, taste and confusion have all been reported by patients and a number of severe cases have reported incidences of stroke. These are all of concern, as Covid-19 can severely affect the elderly who ordinarily are the most likely to suffer from brain disorders. This small review paper of 27 studies stated that there are four possible ways in which Covid-19 may affect the brain, which put Covid-19 sufferers at an increased risk of long-term brain disorders. This was supported by findings, which showed one third of Covid-19 patients leave hospital with evidence of brain dysfunction. Inflammation was heavily reviewed by the authors as a possible causal factor. It was concluded that patients who survive Covid-19 infection are at an increased risk for developing brain disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, however it was acknowledged that further studies are required. Clinicians could use this study to understand the possible need for both short-term and long-term monitoring of brain function in individuals who have survived Covid-19, especially if they are elderly.
Abstract
Increasing evidence suggests that infection with Sars-CoV-2 causes neurological deficits in a substantial proportion of affected patients. While these symptoms arise acutely during the course of infection, less is known about the possible long-term consequences for the brain. Severely affected COVID-19 cases experience high levels of proinflammatory cytokines and acute respiratory dysfunction and often require assisted ventilation. All these factors have been suggested to cause cognitive decline. Pathogenetically, this may result from direct negative effects of the immune reaction, acceleration or aggravation of pre-existing cognitive deficits, or de novo induction of a neurodegenerative disease. This article summarizes the current understanding of neurological symptoms of COVID-19 and hypothesizes that affected patients may be at higher risk of developing cognitive decline after overcoming the primary COVID-19 infection. A structured prospective evaluation should analyze the likelihood, time course, and severity of cognitive impairment following the COVID-19 pandemic.
-
5.
Short- and potential long-term adverse health outcomes of COVID-19: a rapid review.
Leung, TYM, Chan, AYL, Chan, EW, Chan, VKY, Chui, CSL, Cowling, BJ, Gao, L, Ge, MQ, Hung, IFN, Ip, MSM, et al
Emerging microbes & infections. 2020;9(1):2190-2199
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The Coronavirus pandemic (Covid-19) has infected millions of people worldwide and there is evidence that it affects many systems in the human body. This rapid review summarises the current evidence on short-term negative health outcomes of Covid-19. It also assesses the risk of potential long-term negative effects by looking at data from the other coronaviruses; Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). The burden for caring for Covid-19 survivors is likely to be huge and so policy makers need suitable data to put the appropriate care strategies in place. The review is divided into sections as per body system affected: Immune, respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, hepatic and renal, neurological, dermatological, mental health, pregnancy and prenatal exposure. The evidence (short-term and long-term) is then reviewed by experts in those fields. Further large-scale studies are needed to monitor the adverse effects and to measure the long-term health consequences.
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in millions of patients infected worldwide and indirectly affecting even more individuals through disruption of daily living. Long-term adverse outcomes have been reported with similar diseases from other coronaviruses, namely Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Emerging evidence suggests that COVID-19 adversely affects different systems in the human body. This review summarizes the current evidence on the short-term adverse health outcomes and assesses the risk of potential long-term adverse outcomes of COVID-19. Major adverse outcomes were found to affect different body systems: immune system (including but not limited to Guillain-Barré syndrome and paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome), respiratory system (lung fibrosis and pulmonary thromboembolism), cardiovascular system (cardiomyopathy and coagulopathy), neurological system (sensory dysfunction and stroke), as well as cutaneous and gastrointestinal manifestations, impaired hepatic and renal function. Mental health in patients with COVID-19 was also found to be adversely affected. The burden of caring for COVID-19 survivors is likely to be huge. Therefore, it is important for policy makers to develop comprehensive strategies in providing resources and capacity in the healthcare system. Future epidemiological studies are needed to further investigate the long-term impact on COVID-19 survivors.
-
6.
'The long tail of Covid-19' - The detection of a prolonged inflammatory response after a SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic and mildly affected patients.
Doykov, I, Hällqvist, J, Gilmour, KC, Grandjean, L, Mills, K, Heywood, WE
F1000Research. 2020;9:1349
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
‘Long COVID’ or the persistence of symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection, such as fatigue, is becoming increasingly common. As the emergence of the virus is still relatively recent in research terms, little is known about the long-term impact of the viruses infection. This study sought to generate further insights into the management and diagnostic of long COVID, by assessing a range of inflammatory markers from blood serum samples. Examined were 10 samples of health care workers with previous asymptomatic or moderate SARS-CoV-2 infections, compared to 10 samples of SARS-CoV-2 naive health care workers. The serum was analyzed by mass spectrometry using a customized panel of the 96 immune response associated proteins. Despite being mild to moderate cases, the results showed that even 40-60 days after infection, significant disturbance in the immune systems inflammatory response could be observed. Particularly markers that reflect anti-inflammatory pathways and mitochondrial stress. The study highlighted six of the most noteworthy proteins and included a brief description of their role. The authors suggest that analysing proteins by using targeted proteomic technology, could serve as a cost-effective strategy to further investigate the changes in inflammatory responses post SARS-CoV-2 infection. Which could help to aid the identification of potential treatment targets in the future. Relevant findings from this small study for clinical practice are that even mild to moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection can alter the inflammatory responses for months afterwards.
Abstract
'Long Covid', or medical complications associated with post SARS-CoV-2 infection, is a significant post-viral complication that is being more and more commonly reported in patients. Therefore, there is an increasing need to understand the disease mechanisms, identify drug targets and inflammatory processes associated with a SARS-CoV-2 infection. To address this need, we created a targeted mass spectrometry based multiplexed panel of 96 immune response associated proteins. We applied the multiplex assay to a cohort of serum samples from asymptomatic and moderately affected patients. All patients had tested positive for a SARS-CoV-2 infection by PCR and were determined to be subsequently positive for antibodies. Even 40-60 days post-viral infection, we observed a significant remaining inflammatory response in all patients. Proteins that were still affected were associated with the anti-inflammatory response and mitochondrial stress. This indicates that biochemical and inflammatory pathways within the body can remain perturbed long after SARS-CoV-2 infections have subsided even in asymptomatic and moderately affected patients.
-
7.
Persistent fatigue following SARS-CoV-2 infection is common and independent of severity of initial infection.
Townsend, L, Dyer, AH, Jones, K, Dunne, J, Mooney, A, Gaffney, F, O'Connor, L, Leavy, D, O'Brien, K, Dowds, J, et al
PloS one. 2020;15(11):e0240784
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Tiredness is a common symptom of Covid-19; however, it is unknown if this fatigue persists once recovered. This observational study of 128 recovered Covid-19 patients aimed to determine if fatigue persisted after recovery and whether severity of disease could predict fatigue. The results showed that post Covid-19 fatigue was reported in more than half of the participants and was particularly pronounced in females and in those with depression. Severity of disease did not predict fatigue. It was concluded that fatigue appears to outlast infection and fatigue was independent of disease severity. This study could be used by health care practitioners to understand that fatigue is common even after recovery from Covid-19 infection and women and sufferers of depression are the most susceptible.
Abstract
Fatigue is a common symptom in those presenting with symptomatic COVID-19 infection. However, it is unknown if COVID-19 results in persistent fatigue in those recovered from acute infection. We examined the prevalence of fatigue in individuals recovered from the acute phase of COVID-19 illness using the Chalder Fatigue Score (CFQ-11). We further examined potential predictors of fatigue following COVID-19 infection, evaluating indicators of COVID-19 severity, markers of peripheral immune activation and circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines. Of 128 participants (49.5 ± 15 years; 54% female), more than half reported persistent fatigue (67/128; 52.3%) at median of 10 weeks after initial COVID-19 symptoms. There was no association between COVID-19 severity (need for inpatient admission, supplemental oxygen or critical care) and fatigue following COVID-19. Additionally, there was no association between routine laboratory markers of inflammation and cell turnover (leukocyte, neutrophil or lymphocyte counts, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein) or pro-inflammatory molecules (IL-6 or sCD25) and fatigue post COVID-19. Female gender and those with a pre-existing diagnosis of depression/anxiety were over-represented in those with fatigue. Our findings demonstrate a significant burden of post-viral fatigue in individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection after the acute phase of COVID-19 illness. This study highlights the importance of assessing those recovering from COVID-19 for symptoms of severe fatigue, irrespective of severity of initial illness, and may identify a group worthy of further study and early intervention.
-
8.
Potential Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Therapeutics That Target the Post-Entry Stages of the Viral Life Cycle: A Comprehensive Review.
Al-Horani, RA, Kar, S
Viruses. 2020;12(10)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The covid-19 pandemic has required the identification of therapies to prevent infection and limit severity. A previous paper by the same authors reviewed therapies that block the virus in the early stages of its lifecycle. This very large review of over 300 papers aimed to summarise therapeutics which are aimed at blocking the lifecycle of the virus after it has entered the body’s cells. The authors began by reviewing the lifecycle of the covid-19 virus explaining how it enters the body’s cells, replicates inside and then is released to infect new cells. Several antivirals, antimalarials and natural products were then reviewed. Of note, Remdesivir is being trialled in covid-19 patients, with mixed results, however, is being recommended in the US for the treatment of hospitalised covid-19 patients with severe disease. Ribavirin, which is being trialled in combination with other antivirals is also showing promising results in shortening hospitalisation times in covid-19 patients. It was concluded that any stage of the covid-19 lifecycle could be a target for therapeutics and combining therapies is likely to be more successful than monotherapy. This paper could be used by health care professionals to understand the most recent therapeutic research for covid-19.
Abstract
The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to challenge health care systems around the world. Scientists and pharmaceutical companies have promptly responded by advancing potential therapeutics into clinical trials at an exponential rate. Initial encouraging results have been realized using remdesivir and dexamethasone. Yet, the research continues so as to identify better clinically relevant therapeutics that act either as prophylactics to prevent the infection or as treatments to limit the severity of COVID-19 and substantially decrease the mortality rate. Previously, we reviewed the potential therapeutics in clinical trials that block the early stage of the viral life cycle. In this review, we summarize potential anti-COVID-19 therapeutics that block/inhibit the post-entry stages of the viral life cycle. The review presents not only the chemical structures and mechanisms of the potential therapeutics under clinical investigation, i.e., listed in clinicaltrials.gov, but it also describes the relevant results of clinical trials. Their anti-inflammatory/immune-modulatory effects are also described. The reviewed therapeutics include small molecules, polypeptides, and monoclonal antibodies. At the molecular level, the therapeutics target viral proteins or processes that facilitate the post-entry stages of the viral infection. Frequent targets are the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and the viral proteases such as papain-like protease (PLpro) and main protease (Mpro). Overall, we aim at presenting up-to-date details of anti-COVID-19 therapeutics so as to catalyze their potential effective use in fighting the pandemic.
-
9.
Harnessing the immune system to overcome cytokine storm and reduce viral load in COVID-19: a review of the phases of illness and therapeutic agents.
Khadke, S, Ahmed, N, Ahmed, N, Ratts, R, Raju, S, Gallogly, M, de Lima, M, Sohail, MR
Virology journal. 2020;17(1):154
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Severe manifestations of COVID-19 infection and mortality are associated with a cytokine storm. This is an excessive inflammatory response to the infection leading to an overproduction of pro-inflammatory signalling molecules, which consequently contributes to tissue and organ damage. This literature review summarised current knowledge, as of June 2020, about virus-associated cytokine storm, virus-host interactions and immunological mechanism, to gain a better understanding of the phenomena observed in COVID-19 infections and devise better treatment strategies. The review briefly outlines the epidemiology of COVID-19, predictors of severity of disease, mode of transmission, testing, viral structure, mechanism of invasion of the host cell, replication and immune invasion and the progression of the four stages of the cytokine storm. The second part of the review discusses antiviral therapeutics of interest with a table summarising drugs, mechanism and available data. This article may be of interest to those who like to delve further into the mechanisms and immune components involved in a cytokine storm and gain an oversight of the pathways targeted by allopathic agents that have been put forward as treatment options.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, previously named 2019-nCov), a novel coronavirus that emerged in China in December 2019 and was declared a global pandemic by World Health Organization by March 11th, 2020. Severe manifestations of COVID-19 are caused by a combination of direct tissue injury by viral replication and associated cytokine storm resulting in progressive organ damage. DISCUSSION We reviewed published literature between January 1st, 2000 and June 30th, 2020, excluding articles focusing on pediatric or obstetric population, with a focus on virus-host interactions and immunological mechanisms responsible for virus associated cytokine release syndrome (CRS). COVID-19 illness encompasses three main phases. In phase 1, SARS-CoV-2 binds with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)2 receptor on alveolar macrophages and epithelial cells, triggering toll like receptor (TLR) mediated nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-ƙB) signaling. It effectively blunts an early (IFN) response allowing unchecked viral replication. Phase 2 is characterized by hypoxia and innate immunity mediated pneumocyte damage as well as capillary leak. Some patients further progress to phase 3 characterized by cytokine storm with worsening respiratory symptoms, persistent fever, and hemodynamic instability. Important cytokines involved in this phase are interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. This is typically followed by a recovery phase with production of antibodies against the virus. We summarize published data regarding virus-host interactions, key immunological mechanisms responsible for virus-associated CRS, and potential opportunities for therapeutic interventions. CONCLUSION Evidence regarding SARS-CoV-2 epidemiology and pathogenesis is rapidly evolving. A better understanding of the pathophysiology and immune system dysregulation associated with CRS and acute respiratory distress syndrome in severe COVID-19 is imperative to identify novel drug targets and other therapeutic interventions.
-
10.
Dissecting the interaction between COVID-19 and diabetes mellitus.
Chee, YJ, Tan, SK, Yeoh, E
Journal of diabetes investigation. 2020;11(5):1104-1114
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Several countries have reported higher death rates and more severe cases of covid-19 amongst individuals with chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes. This review of 100 papers aimed to investigate the interconnecting factors which may contribute to poorer prognosis in individuals with covid-19 and type 2 diabetes. Although the evidence suggests that patients with type 2 diabetes have poorer outcomes after contracting covid-19, they are not more susceptible to infection. The paper reported that mechanisms which may increase severity in type 2 diabetics are abnormal immune function, increased susceptibility to inflammation, the increased adherence of the virus to target cells and reduced ability to fight infection. It is important to manage blood sugars when suffering from covid-19. The paper reviewed the use of several medications such as metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4), glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists and insulin in the context of individuals suffering from covid-19, with insulin being the treatment of choice in the acutely ill patient. Current treatments of covid-19 were also reviewed such as chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, Lopinavir-ritonavir, IL-6 receptor agonists, type 1 interferon and remdesivir. It was concluded that clinicians should be aware of the risks in patients with type 2 diabetes and covid-19. However as new data is made available, the chronic and long-term implications will become clearer. This study could be used by health care professionals to ensure that patients with type 2 diabetes do everything they can to avoid covid-19 infection and that if contracted these patients are closely monitored for severe disease.
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic that is caused by a novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2. Data from several countries have shown higher morbidity and mortality among individuals with chronic metabolic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus. In this review, we explore the contributing factors for poorer prognosis in these individuals. As a significant proportion of patients with COVID-19 also have diabetes mellitus, this adds another layer of complexity to their management. We explore potential interactions between antidiabetic medications and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors with COVID-19. Suggested recommendations for the use of antidiabetic medications for COVID-19 patients with diabetes mellitus are provided. We also review pertinent clinical considerations in the management of diabetic ketoacidosis in COVID-19 patients. In addition, we aim to increase clinicians' awareness of the metabolic effects of promising drug therapies for COVID-19. Finally, we highlight the importance of timely vaccinations for patients with diabetes mellitus.
