-
1.
Sodium Butyrate Effectiveness in Children and Adolescents with Newly Diagnosed Inflammatory Bowel Diseases-Randomized Placebo-Controlled Multicenter Trial.
Pietrzak, A, Banasiuk, M, Szczepanik, M, Borys-Iwanicka, A, Pytrus, T, Walkowiak, J, Banaszkiewicz, A
Nutrients. 2022;14(16)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), such as Crohn’s Disease and ulcerative colitis, are chronic gastrointestinal disorders with periods of exacerbation and remission. The disease develops as a result of an abnormal immune response in the gastrointestinal mucosa in genetically predisposed individuals exposed to certain environmental conditions. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of oral sodium butyrate as an add-on to standard therapy in children and adolescents with newly diagnosed IBD. This study is a prospective, randomised, and placebo-controlled trial. Patients (n = 80) were randomised and assigned to one of two groups: group A received butyric acid at a dose of 150 mg, and group B received 150 mg placebo. Results show that supplementation with sodium butyrate to be ineffective in the add-on treatment of newly diagnosed children and adolescents with IBD. Furthermore, during the study, none of the participants reported adverse events. Authors conclude that the results of their study will contribute to further studies that will determine which patients with IBD may benefit from sodium butyrate supplementation. Further clinical trials on large groups of patients are needed to establish if IBD patients may benefit from sodium butyrate.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Butyric acid's effectiveness has not yet been assessed in the pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) population. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of oral sodium butyrate as an add-on to standard therapy in children and adolescents with newly diagnosed IBD. METHODS This was a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter study. Patients aged 6-18 years with colonic Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, who received standard therapy depending on the disease's severity, were randomized to receive 150 mg sodium butyrate twice a day (group A) or placebo (group B). The primary outcome was the difference in disease activity and fecal calprotectin concentration between the two study groups measured at 12 weeks of the study. RESULTS In total, 72 patients with initially active disease completed the study, 29 patients in group A and 43 in group B. At week 12 of the study, the majority of patients achieved remission. No difference in remission rate or median disease activity was found between the two groups (p = 0.37 and 0.31, respectively). None of the patients reported adverse events. CONCLUSIONS A 12-week supplementation with sodium butyrate, as adjunctive therapy, did not show efficacy in newly diagnosed children and adolescents with IBD.
-
2.
High-dose versus standard-dose vitamin D supplementation in older adults with COVID-19 (COVIT-TRIAL): A multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled superiority trial.
Annweiler, C, Beaudenon, M, Gautier, J, Gonsard, J, Boucher, S, Chapelet, G, Darsonval, A, Fougère, B, Guérin, O, Houvet, M, et al
PLoS medicine. 2022;19(5):e1003999
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused hundreds of thousands of deaths, mostly in older adults. The aim of this study was to test whether a single oral high-dose of cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) administered within 72 hours after the diagnosis of COVID-19 improves, compared to standard-dose cholecalciferol, the 14-day overall survival among at-risk older adults who are positive to COVID-19. This study is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, parallel group, intent-to-treat, randomised controlled superiority clinical trial which involves the collaboration of 9 medical centres. Eligible participants (n=260) were randomly assigned to receive a single oral dose of either 400,000 IU (n=130) or 50,000 IU (n=130) cholecalciferol on the day of inclusion. Results show: - reduced overall mortality at day 14. - that high-dose cholecalciferol was safe and did not result in more frequent adverse effects compared to the standard dose. - that some benefits were also found on the 14-day mortality due to COVID-19 as well as on the overall mortality between day 6 and day 14. - that there was no evidence that the single high-dose vitamin D3 administered early in COVID-19 provided any benefit on overall mortality for up to 28 days. Authors conclude that high-dose oral cholecalciferol supplementation is a simple, safe, and inexpensive treatment which may be of interest as an adjuvant to provide a bridge to recovery for at-risk older adults facing the emergence of immune escape variants.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vitamin D supplementation has been proposed as a treatment for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) based on experimental data and data from small and uncontrolled observational studies. The COvid19 and VITamin d TRIAL (COVIT-TRIAL) study was conducted to test whether a single oral high dose of cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) administered within 72 hours after the diagnosis of COVID-19 improves, compared to standard-dose cholecalciferol, the 14-day overall survival among at-risk older adults infected with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). METHODS AND FINDINGS This multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, superiority trial involved collaboration of 9 medical centers in France. Patients admitted to the hospital units or living in nursing homes adjacent to the investigator centers were eligible if they were ≥65 years, had SARS-CoV-2 infection of less than 3 days, and at least 1 COVID-19 worsening risk factor (among age ≥75 years, SpO2 ≤94%, or PaO2/FiO2 ≤300 mm Hg). Main noninclusion criteria were organ failure requiring ICU, SpO2 ≤92% despite 5 L/min oxygen, life expectancy <3 months, vitamin D supplementation >800 IU/day during the preceding month, and contraindications to vitamin D supplements. Eligible and consenting patients were randomly allocated to either a single oral high-dose (400,000 IU) or standard-dose (50,000 IU) cholecalciferol administered under medical supervision within 72 hours after the diagnosis of COVID-19. Participants and local study staff were not masked to the allocated treatment, but the Steering Committee and the Data and Safety Monitoring Board were masked to the randomization group and outcome data during the trial. The primary outcome was 14-day overall mortality. Between April 15 and December 17, 2020, of 1,207 patients who were assessed for eligibility in the COVIT-TRIAL study, 254 met eligibility criteria and formed the intention-to-treat population. The median age was 88 (IQR, 82 to 92) years, and 148 patients (58%) were women. Overall, 8 (6%) of 127 patients allocated to high-dose cholecalciferol, and 14 (11%) of 127 patients allocated to standard-dose cholecalciferol died within 14 days (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.39 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 to 0.99], P = 0.049, after controlling for randomization strata [i.e., age, oxygen requirement, hospitalization, use of antibiotics, anti-infective drugs, and/or corticosteroids] and baseline imbalances in important prognostic factors [i.e., sex, ongoing cancers, profuse diarrhea, and delirium at baseline]). The number needed to treat for one person to benefit (NNTB) was 21 [NNTB 9 to ∞ to number needed to treat for one person to harm (NNTH) 46]. Apparent benefits were also found on 14-day mortality due to COVID-19 (7 (6%) deaths in high-dose group and 14 (11%) deaths in standard-dose group; adjusted hazard ratio = 0.33 [95% CI, 0.12 to 0.86], P = 0.02). The protective effect of the single oral high-dose administration was not sustained at 28 days (19 (15%) deaths in high-dose group and 21 (17%) deaths in standard-dose group; adjusted hazard ratio = 0.70 [95% CI, 0.36 to 1.36], P = 0.29). High-dose cholecalciferol did not result in more frequent adverse effects compared to the standard dose. The open-label design and limited study power are the main limitations of the study. CONCLUSIONS In this randomized controlled trial (RCT), we observed that the early administration of high-dose versus standard-dose vitamin D3 to at-risk older patients with COVID-19 improved overall mortality at day 14. The effect was no longer observed after 28 days. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04344041.
-
3.
An Isocaloric Nordic Diet Modulates RELA and TNFRSF1A Gene Expression in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells in Individuals with Metabolic Syndrome-A SYSDIET Sub-Study.
Ulven, SM, Holven, KB, Rundblad, A, Myhrstad, MCW, Leder, L, Dahlman, I, Mello, VD, Schwab, U, Carlberg, C, Pihlajamäki, J, et al
Nutrients. 2019;11(12)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) alongside other related risk factors has been implicated as increasing an individual’s risk for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. MetS is associated with chronic low-grade inflammation and raised blood lipid levels, which have been shown to improve in individuals when put on a Nordic diet (ND). In this sub-study of the SYSDIET study, which was a 18-24 week randomised controlled multi centre study, the aim was to examine the effect of a ND compared to a control diet (CD) on genes that are involved in the production of inflammatory molecules and lipids. Blood samples of 88 obese participants from the SYSDIET study were analysed for various inflammatory molecule producing genes and lipid molecule producing genes. The results showed that compared to CD, ND increased the presence of the inflammatory gene RELA, but decreased the presence of inflammatory gene TNFRSF1A. No differences were observed in other inflammatory genes and no differences were observed in lipid producing genes. It was concluded that consuming a ND compared to a CD may affect the production of inflammatory genes; however further studies are required to determine if the ND improves the amount of blood lipids because of an altered presence of lipid producing genes. The implication of this for practitioners is that further research of the SYSDIET is needed. In addition, a Nordic diet may improve inflammation in obese individuals because of a reduction in the production of inflammatory genes.
Abstract
A healthy dietary pattern is associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and reduced inflammation. To explore this at the molecular level, we investigated the effect of a Nordic diet (ND) on changes in the gene expression profiles of inflammatory and lipid-related genes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of individuals with MetS. We hypothesized that the intake of an ND compared to a control diet (CD) would alter the expression of inflammatory genes and genes involved in lipid metabolism. The individuals with MetS underwent an 18/24-week randomized intervention to compare a ND with a CD. Eighty-eight participants (66% women) were included in this sub-study of the larger SYSDIET study. Fasting PBMCs were collected before and after the intervention and changes in gene expression levels were measured using TaqMan Array Micro Fluidic Cards. Forty-eight pre-determined inflammatory and lipid related gene transcripts were analyzed. The expression level of the gene tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily member 1A (TNFRSF1A) was down-regulated (p = 0.004), whereas the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) subunit, RELA proto-oncogene, was up-regulated (p = 0.016) in the ND group compared to the CD group. In conclusion, intake of an ND in individuals with the MetS may affect immune function.
-
4.
Vitamin D for the Immune System in Cystic Fibrosis (DISC): a double-blind, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Tangpricha, V, Lukemire, J, Chen, Y, Binongo, JNG, Judd, SE, Michalski, ES, Lee, MJ, Walker, S, Ziegler, TR, Tirouvanziam, R, et al
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2019;109(3):544-553
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) have a mutation in a particular gene which results in derangements in chloride transport across epithelial surfaces, leading to abnormally thickened mucus on the surfaces of the lung, pancreas, intestines, and other organs. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of high-dose vitamin D3 administered to adults with CF during and after an acute pulmonary exacerbation. The study is a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Subjects were randomly assigned and stratified to one of the two groups: vitamin D (5 capsules of vitamin D3 containing 50,000 IU) or placebo (5 capsules that were identical in size, shape, and colour to the vitamin D3 capsule). Results demonstrated that high-dose vitamin D3 administration to adults with CF initiated at the time of a pulmonary exacerbation did not improve time to next pulmonary exacerbation or 1 year survival. Authors conclude that a high-dose vitamin D3 bolus, combined with maintenance therapy given to adults with CF during acute pulmonary exacerbation of CF did not improve 1 year survival or recovery of lung function.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) have increased risk of vitamin D deficiency owing to fat malabsorption and other factors. Vitamin D deficiency has been associated with increased risk of pulmonary exacerbations of CF. OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this study was to examine the impact of a single high-dose bolus of vitamin D3 followed by maintenance treatment given to adults with CF during an acute pulmonary exacerbation on future recurrence of pulmonary exacerbations. METHODS This was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, intent-to-treat clinical trial. Subjects with CF were randomly assigned to oral vitamin D3 given as a single dose of 250,000 International Units (IU) or to placebo within 72 h of hospital admission for an acute pulmonary exacerbation, followed by 50,000 IU of vitamin D3 or an identically matched placebo pill taken orally every other week starting at 3 mo after random assignment. The primary outcome was the composite endpoint of the time to next pulmonary exacerbation or death within 1 y. The secondary outcomes included circulating concentrations of the antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin and recovery of lung function as assessed by the percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1%). RESULTS A total of 91 subjects were enrolled in the study. There were no differences between the vitamin D3 and placebo groups in time to next pulmonary exacerbation or death at 1 y. In addition, there were no differences in serial recovery of lung function after pulmonary exacerbation by FEV1% or in serial concentrations of plasma cathelicidin. CONCLUSIONS Vitamin D3 initially given at the time of pulmonary exacerbation of CF did not alter the time to the next pulmonary exacerbation, 12-mo mortality, serial lung function, or serial plasma cathelicidin concentrations. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01426256.
-
5.
A Pilot Study To Investigate the Immune-Modulatory Effects of Fasting in Steroid-Naive Mild Asthmatics.
Han, K, Nguyen, A, Traba, J, Yao, X, Kaler, M, Huffstutler, RD, Levine, SJ, Sack, MN
Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950). 2018;201(5):1382-1388
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Previous studies have shown that caloric restriction and fasting may modulate immune function and have positive effects in asthmatics. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the effects of fasting on specific inflammatory markers that might mediate such benefits. 18 mild asthmatics, 5 of whom were not on steroid inhalers, fasted for 24 hours. Lung function and immune parameters were evaluated at baseline and 2.5 hours after the first meal following the fast. There were significant differences between subjects who were and were not on steroid inhalers. Whilst one day of fasting did not affect lung function, a number of inflammatory parameters were improved by fasting in those not taking steroid inhalers, but not in those who were taking steroids. The authors conclude that caloric restriction might be considered as a strategy to improve systemic and pulmonary inflammation in asthma.
Abstract
A fasting mimetic diet blunts inflammation, and intermittent fasting has shown ameliorative effects in obese asthmatics. To examine whether canonical inflammatory pathways linked with asthma are modulated by fasting, we designed a pilot study in mild asthmatic subjects to assess the effect of fasting on the NLRP3 inflammasome, Th2 cell activation, and airway epithelial cell cytokine production. Subjects with documented reversible airway obstruction and stable mild asthma were recruited into this study in which pulmonary function testing (PFT) and PBMCextraction was performed 24 h after fasting, with repeated PFT testing and blood draw 2.5 h after refeeding. PFTs were not changed by a prolonged fast. However, steroid-naive mild asthmatics showed fasting-dependent blunting of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Furthermore, PBMCs from these fasted asthmatics cocultured with human epithelial cells resulted in blunting of house dust mite-induced epithelial cell cytokine production and reduced CD4+ T cell Th2 activation compared with refed samples. This pilot study shows that prolonged fasting blunts the NLRP3 inflammasome and Th2 cell activation in steroid-naive asthmatics as well as diminishes airway epithelial cell cytokine production. This identifies a potential role for nutrient level-dependent regulation of inflammation in asthma. Our findings support the evaluation of this concept in a larger study as well as the potential development of caloric restriction interventions for the treatment of asthma.
-
6.
Randomized trial of peanut consumption in infants at risk for peanut allergy.
Du Toit, G, Roberts, G, Sayre, PH, Bahnson, HT, Radulovic, S, Santos, AF, Brough, HA, Phippard, D, Basting, M, Feeney, M, et al
The New England journal of medicine. 2015;372(9):803-13
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Children with peanut allergies are at a higher risk of death and anaphylaxis. This randomised, open-label, controlled study investigated whether reducing peanut exposure or eliminating peanuts is a better strategy to prevent peanut allergy development. Six hundred and forty infants between the ages of four months and eleven months old were randomly assigned to different cohorts depending on whether they had a pre-existing sensitivity to peanut extract. The study also assessed the proportion of infants with peanut allergies at 60 months. The introduction of peanuts at an early age significantly reduced peanut allergies in infants at high risk. Those who consumed peanuts had elevated peanut-specific IgG4 antibody levels whereas those who avoided peanuts had elevated peanut-specific IgE antibody levels. At the age of sixty months, the proportion of infants in the intention-to-treat group that developed peanut allergy was higher in the infants who avoided peanuts than in those who consumed them. As this study only included low-risk infants, future robust studies will be required to prove the benefits of peanuts’ early introduction. These results can be used by healthcare professionals to develop potential strategies to reduce the prevalence of peanut allergy in children.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of peanut allergy among children in Western countries has doubled in the past 10 years, and peanut allergy is becoming apparent in Africa and Asia. We evaluated strategies of peanut consumption and avoidance to determine which strategy is most effective in preventing the development of peanut allergy in infants at high risk for the allergy. METHODS We randomly assigned 640 infants with severe eczema, egg allergy, or both to consume or avoid peanuts until 60 months of age. Participants, who were at least 4 months but younger than 11 months of age at randomization, were assigned to separate study cohorts on the basis of preexisting sensitivity to peanut extract, which was determined with the use of a skin-prick test--one consisting of participants with no measurable wheal after testing and the other consisting of those with a wheal measuring 1 to 4 mm in diameter. The primary outcome, which was assessed independently in each cohort, was the proportion of participants with peanut allergy at 60 months of age. RESULTS Among the 530 infants in the intention-to-treat population who initially had negative results on the skin-prick test, the prevalence of peanut allergy at 60 months of age was 13.7% in the avoidance group and 1.9% in the consumption group (P<0.001). Among the 98 participants in the intention-to-treat population who initially had positive test results, the prevalence of peanut allergy was 35.3% in the avoidance group and 10.6% in the consumption group (P=0.004). There was no significant between-group difference in the incidence of serious adverse events. Increases in levels of peanut-specific IgG4 antibody occurred predominantly in the consumption group; a greater percentage of participants in the avoidance group had elevated titers of peanut-specific IgE antibody. A larger wheal on the skin-prick test and a lower ratio of peanut-specific IgG4:IgE were associated with peanut allergy. CONCLUSIONS The early introduction of peanuts significantly decreased the frequency of the development of peanut allergy among children at high risk for this allergy and modulated immune responses to peanuts. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00329784.).
-
7.
Oats in the diet of children with celiac disease: preliminary results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter Italian study.
Gatti, S, Caporelli, N, Galeazzi, T, Francavilla, R, Barbato, M, Roggero, P, Malamisura, B, Iacono, G, Budelli, A, Gesuita, R, et al
Nutrients. 2013;5(11):4653-64
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Coeliac disease (CD) is an immune-mediated disorder triggered by ingestion of gluten in genetically susceptible individuals. Currently the only available treatment for CD is a gluten-free diet (GFD). The inclusion of oats in a GFD is still debated although several clinical trials have demonstrated that most patients have no adverse side effects. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and tolerance of gluten-free oats in children with CD. Intestinal symptoms, serological markers and intestinal permeability were monitored for 15 months. The study included 171 participants aged 4-14 who have been diagnosed with CD and on a GFD for at least two years. The findings of this study showed that prolonged intake of oats did not result in any negative clinical changes in children with CD. Based on this study, the authors’ conclusions support that gluten-free oats are safe and well tolerated when administered for a 6-month period of time.
Abstract
A gluten-free diet (GFD) is currently the only available treatment for patients with celiac disease (CD). Several clinical trials have demonstrated that most celiac patients can tolerate a medium-high quantity of oats without any negative clinical effects; however, the inclusion of oats in GFD is still a matter of debate. In this study, Italian children with CD were enrolled in a 15-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Participants were randomized in two groups following either A-B treatment (6 months of diet "A", 3 months of standard GFD, 6 months of diet "B"), or B-A treatment (6 months of diet "B", 3 months of standard GFD, 6 months of diet "A"). A and B diets included gluten-free (GF) products (flour, pasta, biscuits, cakes and crisp toasts) with either purified oats or placebo. Clinical data (Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rate Scale [GSRS] score) and intestinal permeability tests (IPT), were measured through the study period. Although the study is still blinded, no significant differences were found in GSRS score or the urinary lactulose/mannitol (L/M) ratio between the two groups after 6 months of treatment. These preliminary results suggest that the addition of non-contaminated oats from selected varieties in the treatment of children with CD does not determine changes in intestinal permeability and gastrointestinal symptoms.