-
1.
Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 decreases subjective academic stress in healthy adults: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.
Wauters, L, Van Oudenhove, L, Accarie, A, Geboers, K, Geysen, H, Toth, J, Luypaerts, A, Verbeke, K, Smokvina, T, Raes, J, et al
Gut microbes. 2022;14(1):2031695
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Previous research has shown a bidirectional relationship between the gut and psychological stress, which could be mediated by intestinal permeability followed by an immune and inflammatory response. However, the exact mechanisms of this relationship are yet to be elucidated. This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the beneficial effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 on intestinal permeability and stress markers during a public speech in healthy students. Participants consumed either milk containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 or acidified milk twice daily for four weeks to assess subjective and objective stress markers and markers of intestinal permeability. Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 reduced the stress-induced hyperpermeability to mannitol and subjective stress markers (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory/ STAI). A subgroup of healthy students with stress-induced cortisol >P90 of baseline showed a reduction in perceived stress score following Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 intervention. To evaluate the additional effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 on stress and gut health, further robust studies are needed. Healthcare professionals can use the findings of this study to understand the anxiolytic effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690.
Abstract
Psychological stress negatively affects the intestinal barrier function in animals and humans. We aimed to study the effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 on intestinal permeability and stress-markers during public speech. Healthy students were randomized to L. rhamnosus-containing (test) or acidified (placebo) milk consumed twice daily for 4 weeks, with 46 subjects per treatment group. Small intestinal permeability was quantified by a 2 h urinary lactulose-mannitol ratio (LMR, primary outcome), fractional excretion of lactulose (FEL) and mannitol (FEM). Salivary cortisol, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and Perceived Stress scores (PSS) were collected. No between-treatment differences were found for LMR (p = .71), FEL or FEM. Within-treatment analyses showed similar LMR and FEL but a stress-induced increase of FEM with the placebo (p < .05) but not test product. Despite a similar increase in salivary cortisol, the stress-induced increase in STAI was significantly lower with the test product vs. placebo (p = .01). Moreover, a stress-preventative effect of the probiotic was found for PSS and more pronounced in subjects with high stress-induced cortisol (p = .01). While increased FEM was mediated by salivary cortisol levels, the effect of the test product on subjective stress was not mediated by changes in FEM. No serious adverse events occurred. In conclusion, we demonstrated that L. rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 prevented stress-induced hyperpermeability to mannitol. Subjective but not objective stress-markers were reduced with L. rhamnosus vs. placebo, suggesting anxiolytic effects, which were independent of barrier stabilization and attractive for the reduction of stress in both health and disease. Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT03408691.
-
2.
A randomized trial of probiotic supplementation in nurses to reduce stress and viral illness.
Slykerman, RF, Li, E
Scientific reports. 2022;12(1):14742
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Dynamic communication occurs between the gut microbiota and the central nervous system along multiple physiological pathways. Stress increases glucocorticoid production and activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, affecting immunological function and neuronal changes. The aim of this study was to investigate whether supplementation with the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 could reduce symptoms of stress and anxiety and improve psychological wellbeing in nurses working during the COVID19 pandemic. This study was a large double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial of probiotic supplementation with two parallel arms and a ratio of allocation to probiotic or placebo of 1:1. Results showed that following the intervention, stress, anxiety, and psychological wellbeing were not significantly different between nurses supplemented with the probiotic and those who received the placebo. Furthermore, the average number of days per week that nurses reported symptoms of cold or flu-like illness did not significantly differ between the probiotic and placebo supplemented groups. Authors conclude that there weren’t significant differences in outcomes between the probiotic and placebo groups.
Abstract
Animal studies demonstrate how the gut microbiota influence psychological health and immunity to viral infections through their actions along multiple dynamic pathways in the body. Considerable interest exists in probiotics to reduce stress and illness symptoms through beneficial effects in the gut, but translating pre-clinical evidence from animal models into humans remains challenging. We conducted a large trial in nurses working during the 2020 COVID19 pandemic year to establish whether daily ingestion of the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 reduced perceived stress and the number of days participants reported symptoms of a viral illness. Our results showed no significant difference in perceived stress or the average number of illness days between probiotic supplemented nurses and the placebo group. Stress and viral illness symptoms reduced during the study for all participants, a trajectory likely influenced by societal-level factors. The powerful effect of a well-managed public health response to the COVID19 pandemic and the elimination of COVID19 from the community in 2020 may have altered the trajectory of stress levels and reduced circulating viral infections making it difficult to detect any effect of probiotic supplementation. Our study highlights the challenge in controlling environmental factors in human trials.
-
3.
Dietary alteration of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids for headache reduction in adults with migraine: randomized controlled trial.
Ramsden, CE, Zamora, D, Faurot, KR, MacIntosh, B, Horowitz, M, Keyes, GS, Yuan, ZX, Miller, V, Lynch, C, Honvoh, G, et al
BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2021;374:n1448
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
This study could be of interest to practitioners who are interested in dietary interventions that may decrease the incidence or severity of headaches in women. Omega 3 fatty acids such as eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) are believed to be precursors for molecules that may have pain reducing properties. Whereas omega 6 fatty acids such as linoleic acid are believed to be precursors for molecules that may have pain promoting effects. The objective of this 3 armed randomised, double blinded controlled trial was to determine whether increasing dietary intake of omega 3 EPA and DHA, whilst either maintaining or decreasing omega 6 linoleic acid, may lead to a decrease in headache frequency and severity. 182 participants were assigned into one of 3 treatment groups, the first, H3 diet, increasing EPA and DHA to 1.5g/day and maintaining linoleic acid, the second, H3-L6 diet, increasing EPA and DHA to 1.5g/day whilst decreasing linoleic acid and the control group maintaining EPA, DHA and linoleic acid. Both the H3 and H3-L6 diets increased the levels of the molecule believed to be involved in reducing pain to a statistically significant level. This was found to be consistent with the results reported by the patients both in headache hours per day and days with headache in the month. The authors conclude that increasing levels of omega 3 fatty acids in the diet whilst decreasing levels of omega 6 fatty acids in the diet may decrease the frequency and severity of headaches. This study was for 16 weeks and predominantly women with a mean age of 38, further studies for longer and on other populations such as men, children and older populations, would be required to see if the same results could be obtained.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Important from a public health perspective
- Increasing n-3 levels and decreasing n-6 levels could be modified by dietary change and appear to reduce the frequency and duration of headaches in migraine sufferers
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Background
Circulating lipid mediators have been implicated in headache pathogenesis.
Objective
To determine whether dietary interventions that increase n-3 fatty acids with and without reduction in n-6 linoleic acid can alter circulating lipid mediators implicated in headache pathogenesis, and decrease headache in adults with migraine.
Study Design
Three arm, parallel group, randomized, modified double blind, controlled trial.
Participants
182 participants (88% women, mean age 38 years) with migraines on 5-20 days per month (67% met criteria for chronic migraine).
Interventions
Three diets designed with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and linoleic acid altered as controlled variables:
- H3 diet (n=61)—increase EPA+DHA to 1.5 g/day and maintain linoleic acid at around 7% of total energy intake
- H3-L6 diet (n=61)—increase n-3 EPA+DHA to 1.5 g/day and decrease linoleic acid to ≤1.8% of total energy intake
- Control diet (n=60)—maintain EPA+DHA at <150 mg/day and linoleic acid at around 7% of total energy intake
All participants received foods accounting for two thirds of daily food energy and 1/3rd from foods not provided by the Research Kitchen. For these foods participants rely on their training by the dietitian and website diet guides for shopping and choosing foods in restaurants. Participants were encouraged to continue seeing their headache physician and continue usual care.
Results
In intention-to-treat analyses (n=182) at 16 weeks
- The H3-L6 and H3 diets increased circulating 17-HDHA compared with the control diet (baseline-adjusted mean difference 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.2 to 0.9; 0.7, 0.4 to 1.1, respectively).
- The observed improvement in HIT-6 scores (quality of life) in the H3-L6 and H3 groups was not statistically significant (−1.6, −4.2 to 1.0, and −1.5, −4.2 to 1.2, respectively).
- Compared with the control diet, the H3-L6 and H3 diets decreased total headache hours per day (−1.7, −2.5 to −0.9, and −1.3, −2.1 to −0.5, respectively), moderate to severe headache hours per day, (−0.8, −1.2 to −0.4, and −0.7, −1.1 to −0.3, respectively) and headache days per month (−4.0, −5.2 to −2.7, and −2.0, −3.3 to −0.7, respectively).
- The H3-L6 diet decreased headache days per month more than the H3 diet, suggesting additional benefit from lowering dietary linoleic acid (−2.0, −3.2 to −0.8).
- The H3-L6 and H3 diets altered n-3 and n-6 fatty acids and several of their nociceptive oxylipin derivatives in plasma, serum, erythrocytes or immune cells, but did not alter classic headache mediators calcitonin gene related peptide and prostaglandin E2.
Conclusions
The H3-L6 and H3 interventions altered bioactive mediators implicated in headache pathogenesis and decreased frequency and severity of headaches, but did not significantly improve quality of life.
Clinical practice applications:
These findings might be useful for Nutritional Therapists and Clinical Practitioners:
- To inform practitioners of the benefits of assessing n-3 and n-6 fatty acids in migraine patients.
- Inform practitioners of the potential benefits to reducing n-6 as well as increasing n-3 levels in migraine patients
- Inform practitioners of the potential lack of correlation between headache duration and frequency and quality of life measures
Considerations for future research:
- Trialing larger doses of n-3
- Longer term follow up whilst maintaining these diets
- Attempting to validate an optimal serum level of 17-HDHA for these patients that could be used in clinical practice
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether dietary interventions that increase n-3 fatty acids with and without reduction in n-6 linoleic acid can alter circulating lipid mediators implicated in headache pathogenesis, and decrease headache in adults with migraine. DESIGN Three arm, parallel group, randomized, modified double blind, controlled trial. SETTING Ambulatory, academic medical center in the United States over 16 weeks. PARTICIPANTS 182 participants (88% women, mean age 38 years) with migraines on 5-20 days per month (67% met criteria for chronic migraine). INTERVENTIONS Three diets designed with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and linoleic acid altered as controlled variables: H3 diet (n=61)-increase EPA+DHA to 1.5 g/day and maintain linoleic acid at around 7% of energy; H3-L6 diet (n=61)-increase n-3 EPA+DHA to 1.5 g/day and decrease linoleic acid to ≤1.8% of energy; control diet (n=60)-maintain EPA+DHA at <150 mg/day and linoleic acid at around 7% of energy. All participants received foods accounting for two thirds of daily food energy and continued usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary endpoints (week 16) were the antinociceptive mediator 17-hydroxydocosahexaenoic acid (17-HDHA) in blood and the headache impact test (HIT-6), a six item questionnaire assessing headache impact on quality of life. Headache frequency was assessed daily with an electronic diary. RESULTS In intention-to-treat analyses (n=182), the H3-L6 and H3 diets increased circulating 17-HDHA (log ng/mL) compared with the control diet (baseline-adjusted mean difference 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.2 to 0.9; 0.7, 0.4 to 1.1, respectively). The observed improvement in HIT-6 scores in the H3-L6 and H3 groups was not statistically significant (-1.6, -4.2 to 1.0, and -1.5, -4.2 to 1.2, respectively). Compared with the control diet, the H3-L6 and H3 diets decreased total headache hours per day (-1.7, -2.5 to -0.9, and -1.3, -2.1 to -0.5, respectively), moderate to severe headache hours per day (-0.8, -1.2 to -0.4, and -0.7, -1.1 to -0.3, respectively), and headache days per month (-4.0, -5.2 to -2.7, and -2.0, -3.3 to -0.7, respectively). The H3-L6 diet decreased headache days per month more than the H3 diet (-2.0, -3.2 to -0.8), suggesting additional benefit from lowering dietary linoleic acid. The H3-L6 and H3 diets altered n-3 and n-6 fatty acids and several of their nociceptive oxylipin derivatives in plasma, serum, erythrocytes or immune cells, but did not alter classic headache mediators calcitonin gene related peptide and prostaglandin E2. CONCLUSIONS The H3-L6 and H3 interventions altered bioactive mediators implicated in headache pathogenesis and decreased frequency and severity of headaches, but did not significantly improve quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02012790.
-
4.
The Role of Bacteria and Its Derived Metabolites in Chronic Pain and Depression: Recent Findings and Research Progress.
Li, S, Hua, D, Wang, Q, Yang, L, Wang, X, Luo, A, Yang, C
The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology. 2020;23(1):26-41
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Depression is closely associated with chronic pain yet the connection between these comorbidities is ambiguous. Recent studies have shown alterations in the gut microbiome may contribute to cognitive dysfunction via the microbiota-gut-brain axis. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the existing evidence of the role of the gut microbiome in chronic pain and depression and explore potential mechanisms of gut dysbiosis in the development of these conditions. This review found metabolic products from the gut microbiota can mediate neuro-inflammation and neuro-immunity pathways in pain and depression, and that dysbiosis in the gut may contribute to the cause of chronic pain and depression. The authors conclude the metabolic products from the gut bacteria offer new insights to the connection between the gut microbiota and mechanisms of pain and depression, while showing potential as a therapeutic target.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pain is frequently comorbid with depression in clinical practice. Recently, alterations in gut microbiota and metabolites derived therefrom have been found to potentially contribute to abnormal behaviors and cognitive dysfunction via the "microbiota-gut-brain" axis. METHODS PubMed was searched and we selected relevant studies before October 1, 2019. The search keyword string included "pain OR chronic pain" AND "gut microbiota OR metabolites"; "depression OR depressive disorder" AND "gut microbiota OR metabolites". We also searched the reference lists of key articles manually. RESULTS This review systematically summarized the recent evidence of gut microbiota and metabolites in chronic pain and depression in animal and human studies. The results showed the pathogenesis and therapeutics of chronic pain and depression might be partially due to gut microbiota dysbiosis. Importantly, bacteria-derived metabolites, including short-chain fatty acids, tryptophan-derived metabolites, and secondary bile acids, offer new insights into the potential linkage between key triggers in gut microbiota and potential mechanisms of depression. CONCLUSION Studying gut microbiota and its metabolites has contributed to the understanding of comorbidity of chronic pain and depression. Consequently, modulating dietary structures or supplementation of specific bacteria may be an available strategy for treating chronic pain and depression.
-
5.
Reductions in anti-inflammatory gut bacteria are associated with depression in a sample of young adults.
Liu, RT, Rowan-Nash, AD, Sheehan, AE, Walsh, RFL, Sanzari, CM, Korry, BJ, Belenky, P
Brain, behavior, and immunity. 2020;88:308-324
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Alterations to the gut microbiota may be associated with depression and anxiety disorders through a pathway known as the gut-brain axis. Inflammation may be the mediator between the two, as individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) have reported high levels of inflammation, which the gut microbiota may have the capacity to protect against. This observational study of the gut microbiota of 90 young adults with MDD and 47 healthy controls aimed to determine the relationship between inflammatory gut microbiota and symptoms of depression. The results showed changes to several species of gut microbiota in those with MDD and that the level of change was related to MDD symptom severity. These changes were observed even in those taking psychotropic medications. Changes at the taxonomic level indicated that those with higher symptoms of depression had more pronounced differences compared with healthy controls. Although the observed differences were indicative of an inflammatory microbiome, no changes were observed in blood markers of inflammation between those individuals with MDD and healthy controls. It was concluded that the gut microbiome of individuals with MDD was different from healthy individuals in favour of an inflammatory environment. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that the status of the gut microbiota may be an important measure in individuals with MDD and that a treatment plan to ensure gut health is considered may help with symptoms of depression.
Abstract
We assessed the gut microbiota of 90 American young adults, comparing 43 participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 47 healthy controls, and found that the MDD subjects had significantly different gut microbiota compared to the healthy controls at multiple taxonomic levels. At the phylum level, participants with MDD had lower levels of Firmicutes and higher levels of Bacteroidetes, with similar trends in the at the class (Clostridia and Bacteroidia) and order (Clostridiales and Bacteroidales) levels. At the genus level, the MDD group had lower levels of Faecalibacterium and other related members of the family Ruminococcaceae, which was also reduced relative to healthy controls. Additionally, the class Gammaproteobacteria and genus Flavonifractor were enriched in participants with MDD. Accordingly, predicted functional differences between the two groups include a reduced abundance of short-chain fatty acid production pathways in the MDD group. We also demonstrated that the magnitude of taxonomic changes was associated with the severity of depressive symptoms in many cases, and that most changes were present regardless of whether depressed participants were taking psychotropic medications. Overall, our results support a link between MDD and lower levels of anti-inflammatory, butyrate-producing bacteria, and may support a connection between the gut microbiota and the chronic, low-grade inflammation often observed in MDD patients.
-
6.
Brown Adipose Crosstalk in Tissue Plasticity and Human Metabolism.
Scheele, C, Wolfrum, C
Endocrine reviews. 2020;41(1)
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Brown adipose tissue (BAT) is an important contributor to the regulation of metabolism via cellular communication with organs such as liver, muscle, gut and central nervous system. BAT is important for heat generation and is at high levels in human infants. Levels of activation of BAT decline as we age and it has been shown that the amount of BAT is smaller and its activity reduced in those with obesity and type 2 diabetes. To date, there is no answer to efficiently restore functional BAT in aging and obese subjects. This review looks at experiments done on the factors secreted from active BAT (batokines). The review aims to provide a structure for the processes and cell types involved in BAT and the recent findings of BAT whole-body communication are discussed. Altogether, these findings demonstrate that BAT has an adaptive capacity. Studying batokines, offers an alternative approach to identify novel drug targets for metabolic regulation.
Abstract
Infants rely on brown adipose tissue (BAT) as a primary source of thermogenesis. In some adult humans, residuals of brown adipose tissue are adjacent to the central nervous system and acute activation increases metabolic rate. Brown adipose tissue (BAT) recruitment occurs during cold acclimation and includes secretion of factors, known as batokines, which target several different cell types within BAT, and promote adipogenesis, angiogenesis, immune cell interactions, and neurite outgrowth. All these processes seem to act in concert to promote an adapted BAT. Recent studies have also provided exciting data on whole body metabolic regulation with a broad spectrum of mechanisms involving BAT crosstalk with liver, skeletal muscle, and gut as well as the central nervous system. These widespread interactions might reflect the property of BAT of switching between an active thermogenic state where energy is highly consumed and drained from the circulation, and the passive thermoneutral state, where energy consumption is turned off. (Endocrine Reviews 41: XXX - XXX, 2020).
-
7.
Using psychoneuroimmunity against COVID-19.
Kim, SW, Su, KP
Brain, behavior, and immunity. 2020;87:4-5
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
This viewpoint article raises awareness of the threat of COVID-19 poses to psychiatric patients who are in mental health hospitals. Those patients appear to have a much elevated mortality rate and are potentially more vulnerable to the effects of panic/anxiety due to the pandemic. Their lifestyle choices, influenced by fears about the virus, may also have a negative effect on their immunity. The article also raises the issue of the effects the pandemic and associated changes to day-to-day life can have on the mental and general health of the rest of the population, and in particular to mental health professionals, whose ability to care for their psychiatric patients may be impaired. The authors also briefly discuss the psychological and immunological mechanisms that connect our mental state to the ability of our immune system to fight infections, and the impact of our lifestyles and environments. To summarise they state that infected patients, uninfected quarantined individuals and medical professionals all require mental health supporting strategies, and that epidemiological studies of potential long-term psychiatric consequences are essential.
Abstract
The worldwide outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) raises concerns of widespread panic and anxiety in individuals subjected to the real or perceived threat of the virus. Compared to general populations, patients who are institutionalized in a closed unit are also very vulnerable to COVID-19 infection and complications. This crisis touched on difficult issues of not only psychiatric care and ethics, but also psychological impacts to psychiatric care givers. In this Viewpoint, we address both physical and biopsychosocial aspects of this infection, as well as the psychoneuroimmunity of preventive strategies of healthy lifestyle, regular exercise, balanced nutrition, quality sleep and a strong connection with people. Social distancing and wearing masks might help us from pathogen exposure, yet such these measures also prevent us from expressing compassion and friendliness. Therefore, all forms of psychological support should be routinely implemented not only to consider psychological resilience but also to enhance psychoneuroimmunity against COVID-19.
-
8.
Effects of Diet Based on IgG Elimination Combined with Probiotics on Migraine Plus Irritable Bowel Syndrome.
Xie, Y, Zhou, G, Xu, Y, He, B, Wang, Y, Ma, R, Chang, Y, He, D, Xu, C, Xiao, Z
Pain research & management. 2019;2019:7890461
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The causes of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are complex and not fully understood, yet the occurrence of migraine has been linked with this disease. As they have an association, therapies used for either disorder may have a direct impact on both. Food sensitivities have been shown to affect both migraines and IBS and the elimination of foods may be of benefit to both disorders. This randomised cross-over trial of 60 individuals with migraine and IBS assessed immune reactions to certain foods and aimed to determine the effect of eliminating these foods and the addition of probiotics on individuals with IBS and migraine. The results showed that after 14 weeks of treatment, only elimination diet combined with probiotics improved migraine and IBS symptoms, resulting in a decrease in the use of medications. Individuals treated with elimination diet or probiotics only did show an improvement in comparison to the start of the trial, however not when compared to the combination treatment It was concluded that elimination diet in combination with probiotics may be of benefit to relieve symptoms of migraine and IBS. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand possible causes of IBS and migraines, and that treatments may involve targeting both illnesses.
Abstract
Several research studies have revealed that migraine has a solid link with gastrointestinal diseases especially irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). This study was carried out to investigate therapeutic potential of diet based on IgG elimination combined with probiotics on migraine plus irritable bowel syndrome. A total of 60 patients diagnosed with migraine plus IBS were recruited for the study. IgG antibodies against 266 food varieties were detected by ELISA. Then, the subjects were randomized into three groups for treatment of IgG elimination diet or probiotics or diet combined with probiotics. Migraine symptom, gut function score, medication use, and serum serotonin level were measured at baseline, 7 weeks, and 14 weeks. Improvement of migraine and gut symptom was achieved at a certain time point. Reduced use of over-the-counter- (OTC-) analgesics was seen in all groups. However, use of triptans did not show significant difference. An increased serum serotonin level was seen in subjects treated with elimination diet and elimination diet combined with probiotics. IgG elimination diet combined with probiotics may be beneficial to migraine plus IBS. It may provide new insight by understanding the intricate relationship between migraine and gastrointestinal diseases.
-
9.
The Sleep-Immune Crosstalk in Health and Disease.
Besedovsky, L, Lange, T, Haack, M
Physiological reviews. 2019;99(3):1325-1380
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The interaction between sleep and immunity is an established phenomena. This thorough review article summarises sleep changes in response to both infectious and non-infectious immune system challenges and describes the role of sleep in supporting the immune system. Details are provided of how sleep affects the innate immune system (first line, rapid defence against infection) as well as the adaptive immune system (second line, delayed defence against infection), using a feedback system which promotes host defence. Sleep is associated with reduced infection risk and can improve infection outcome and vaccination responses. Sleep deprivation is also associated with chronic, low-grade inflammation. Nutrition Practitioners wishing to support immunity can focus on sleep as a simple lifestyle measure to enhance resilience.
Abstract
Sleep and immunity are bidirectionally linked. Immune system activation alters sleep, and sleep in turn affects the innate and adaptive arm of our body's defense system. Stimulation of the immune system by microbial challenges triggers an inflammatory response, which, depending on its magnitude and time course, can induce an increase in sleep duration and intensity, but also a disruption of sleep. Enhancement of sleep during an infection is assumed to feedback to the immune system to promote host defense. Indeed, sleep affects various immune parameters, is associated with a reduced infection risk, and can improve infection outcome and vaccination responses. The induction of a hormonal constellation that supports immune functions is one likely mechanism underlying the immune-supporting effects of sleep. In the absence of an infectious challenge, sleep appears to promote inflammatory homeostasis through effects on several inflammatory mediators, such as cytokines. This notion is supported by findings that prolonged sleep deficiency (e.g., short sleep duration, sleep disturbance) can lead to chronic, systemic low-grade inflammation and is associated with various diseases that have an inflammatory component, like diabetes, atherosclerosis, and neurodegeneration. Here, we review available data on this regulatory sleep-immune crosstalk, point out methodological challenges, and suggest questions open for future research.
-
10.
Anxiety, Depression, and the Microbiome: A Role for Gut Peptides.
Lach, G, Schellekens, H, Dinan, TG, Cryan, JF
Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics. 2018;15(1):36-59
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Hormones released in the gut can have an impact in the brain through a bidirectional relationship, known as the gut-brain axis. The release of these hormones may be controlled by the gut microbiota, however exact mechanisms are not fully understood. Most hormones originating in the gut may have a role in obesity development, which is often associated with psychiatric disorders. Understanding the relationship between gut microbiota and depression through gut derived signalling molecules may be of benefit and was the focus of this review. Diversity and stability of the gut microbiota is important for health, which is disrupted during depression and anxiety. The gut microbiota serves to produce brain, hormone and immune signals that can travel to the brain, and can be affected by poor gut health. For those with depression, side effects of anti-depressants can be a disruption of the gut microbiota, however how this impacts symptoms is not fully understood. It was concluded that although there is strong research on the gut microbiota and depression it is still in its infancy. The role of gut microbiota on signalling with the brain and the rest of the body seems to be important for depression and anxiety. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand how the gut microbiota can play a role in depression.
Abstract
The complex bidirectional communication between the gut and the brain is finely orchestrated by different systems, including the endocrine, immune, autonomic, and enteric nervous systems. Moreover, increasing evidence supports the role of the microbiome and microbiota-derived molecules in regulating such interactions; however, the mechanisms underpinning such effects are only beginning to be resolved. Microbiota-gut peptide interactions are poised to be of great significance in the regulation of gut-brain signaling. Given the emerging role of the gut-brain axis in a variety of brain disorders, such as anxiety and depression, it is important to understand the contribution of bidirectional interactions between peptide hormones released from the gut and intestinal bacteria in the context of this axis. Indeed, the gastrointestinal tract is the largest endocrine organ in mammals, secreting dozens of different signaling molecules, including peptides. Gut peptides in the systemic circulation can bind cognate receptors on immune cells and vagus nerve terminals thereby enabling indirect gut-brain communication. Gut peptide concentrations are not only modulated by enteric microbiota signals, but also vary according to the composition of the intestinal microbiota. In this review, we will discuss the gut microbiota as a regulator of anxiety and depression, and explore the role of gut-derived peptides as signaling molecules in microbiome-gut-brain communication. Here, we summarize the potential interactions of the microbiota with gut hormones and endocrine peptides, including neuropeptide Y, peptide YY, pancreatic polypeptide, cholecystokinin, glucagon-like peptide, corticotropin-releasing factor, oxytocin, and ghrelin in microbiome-to-brain signaling. Together, gut peptides are important regulators of microbiota-gut-brain signaling in health and stress-related psychiatric illnesses.