-
1.
Is immunonutrition superior to standard enteral nutrition in reducing postoperative complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhuo, ZG, Luo, J, Song, HYDTN, Alai, GH, Shen, X, Lin, YD
Journal of B.U.ON. : official journal of the Balkan Union of Oncology. 2021;(1):204-210
Abstract
PURPOSE Perioperative enteral nutrition supports are recommended in esophagus cancer patients. Immunonutrition contains immuno-enhancing nutrients in addition to standard formula. These new nutrients are thought to be efficacious in reducing inflammatory response and improving postoperative immune response and they have been proved to be better than standard enteral nutrition in reducing postoperative complications in gastric cancer. However, if it would lead to a better clinical outcome in patients undergoing esophagectomy remains controversial. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed in the online database of PubMed, Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. The relevant studies were screened out of the results by reading titles and abstracts. Then, we read the full-texts to finally confirm the studies included in this meta-analysis. RESULTS Six randomized controlled trials having enrolled 638 patients were included in the final analysis. The pooled analysis didn't show statistically significant difference between immunonutrition group and standard nutrition group in reducing postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS The postoperative complications are comparable between immunonutrition and the standard enteral nutrition in patients undergoing esophagectomy, but its value in severe malnutrition patients is undetermined, whereas the high tolerance and other advantages brought by the immunonutrition should not be overlooked and need to be further proved.
-
2.
Oropharyngeal Colostrum Positively Modulates the Inflammatory Response in Preterm Neonates.
Martín-Álvarez, E, Diaz-Castro, J, Peña-Caballero, M, Serrano-López, L, Moreno-Fernández, J, Sánchez-Martínez, B, Martín-Peregrina, F, Alonso-Moya, M, Maldonado-Lozano, J, Hurtado-Suazo, JA, et al
Nutrients. 2020;(2)
Abstract
During the first days of life, premature infants have physiological difficulties swallowing, thereby missing out on the benefits of breastfeeding. The aim of this study is to assess the effects of oropharyngeal mother's milk administration in the inflammatory signaling of extremely premature infants. Neonates (n = 100) (<32 week's gestation and/or <1500 g) were divided into two groups: mother's milk group (n = 48), receiving 0.2 mL of oropharyngeal mother's milk every 4 h for the first 15 days of life, and a control group (n = 52), not receiving oropharyngeal mother's milk. Serum concentrations of interleukin (IL) IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-1ra, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and interferón gamma (IFN-γ) were assessed at 1, 3, 15, and 30 days of postnatal life. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were collected. The rate of common neonatal morbidities in both groups was similar. The mother's milk group achieved full enteral feeding earlier, and showed a decrease in Il-6 on days 15 and 30, in IL-8 on day 30, and in TNF-α and INF-γ on day 15, as well as an increase in IL-1ra on days 3 and 15 and in IL-10 on day 30. Oropharyngeal mother's milk administration for 15 days decreases the pro-inflammatory state of preterm neonates and provides full enteral nutrition earlier, which could have a positive influence on the development of the immune system and inflammatory response, thereby positively influencing other developmental outcomes.
-
3.
Does early postoperative enteral ecoimmunonutrition enhance intestinal function in gastric cancer?
Xu, R, Xiao, S, Ding, Z, Zhao, P
Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition. 2020;(3):469-475
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES We assessed the effect of enteral ecoimmunonutrition (enteral nutrition involving probiotics and immune nutrients) on gastric cancer in the postoperative period. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN In total, 60 patients with gastric cancer were randomized into an enteral ecoimmunonutrition group or an enteral nutrition group. Information on postoperative complications; hospitalization length; time to first bowel movement and first flatus; and differences between preoperative and postoperative nutritional status, inflammatory reactions, and immune function was collected. RESULTS No significant between-group differences in nutritional status and complications were observed. C-reactive protein concentrations were lower in the enteral ecoimmunonutrition group than in the enteral nutrition group on postoperative day 7 (p<0.001) and CD4+ concentrations were significantly higher (p=0.01). The enteral ecoimmunonutrition group had a significantly shorter time to first flatus than the enteral nutrition group (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS Early postoperative enteral ecoimmunonutrition significantly improved immune function, reduced inflammatory responses, and promoted intestinal function recovery in patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy.
-
4.
Immunonutrition in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Surgical Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Yang, FA, Chen, YC, Tiong, C
Nutrients. 2020;(9)
Abstract
Immunonutrition is administered to improve the outcome of patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing surgery. However, its effect and mechanism of action remain unclear. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess its effects on postoperative outcome and the immune system. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified and data extracted by two reviewers independently from electronic databases from their inception to 31 October 2019. The result was expressed as the risk ratio (RR) for categorical variables and mean difference (MD) for continuous variables with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Six RCTs published from 1999 and 2016, with a total of 368 patients, were included. The results revealed that immunonutrition significantly decreased the rate of infectious complications (RR = 0.47, 95% CI (0.23, 0.94), p = 0.03) and the length of hospital stay (MD = -1.90, 95% CI (-3.78, -0.02), p = 0.05) by modulating the immune system, especially in preoperative group in subgroup analysis. We therefore recommend that patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing surgery could take the advantage of immunonutrition, especially in the preoperative period.
-
5.
Additional effect of perioperative, compared with preoperative, immunonutrition after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A randomized, controlled trial.
Miyauchi, Y, Furukawa, K, Suzuki, D, Yoshitomi, H, Takayashiki, T, Kuboki, S, Miyazaki, M, Ohtsuka, M
International journal of surgery (London, England). 2019;:69-75
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND We have reported that perioperative and preoperative immunonutrition reduced infectious complications in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy; however, it is unclear whether perioperative immunonutrition has additional effects compared with preoperative immunonutrition. The present study evaluated whether perioperative, compared with preoperative, immunonutrition has additional effects on cell-mediated immunity and the infection rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a prospective, randomized clinical trial conducted in our institution. Oral supplementation enriched with arginine, ω-3 fatty acids, and dietary nucleotides was given by enteral infusion to 30 patients before and after surgery (perioperative group); 30 patients received the same enriched formula before surgery and standard enteral nutrition following surgery (preoperative group). The primary endpoint was concanavalin (Con A)- or phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-stimulated lymphocyte proliferation on postoperative day (POD) 7, which is an index of cell-mediated immunity; the secondary endpoint was the postoperative infection rate. RESULTS There were no significant differences in Con A- or PHA-stimulated lymphocyte proliferation on POD 7 between the groups. There was no significant difference in the postoperative infection rate between the two groups. In the post hoc subgroup analysis, with respect to the effect on the infection rate, a significant interaction was found only between a long operative time and perioperative immunonutrition. CONCLUSIONS There were no additional effects of perioperative, compared with preoperative, immunonutrition on postoperative immunity and infectious complications in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.
-
6.
Combination of arginine, glutamine, and omega-3 fatty acid supplements for perioperative enteral nutrition in surgical patients with gastric adenocarcinoma or gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): A prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
Ma, C, Tsai, H, Su, W, Sun, L, Shih, Y, Wang, J
Journal of postgraduate medicine. 2018;(3):155-163
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative enteral nutrition (EN) enriched with immune-modulating substrates is preferable for patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery. In this study, perioperative EN enriched with immune-modulating nutrients such as arginine, glutamine, and omega-3 fatty acids was evaluated for its anti-inflammatory efficacy in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma or gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) receiving curative surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective, randomized, double-blind study recruited 34 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma or gastric GIST undergoing elective curative surgery. These patients were randomly assigned to the study group, receiving immune-modulating nutrient-enriched EN, or the control group, receiving standard EN from 3 days before surgery (preoperative day 3) to up to postoperative day 14 or discharge. Laboratory and inflammatory parameters were assessed on preoperative day 3 and postoperative day 14 or at discharge. Adverse events (AEs) and clinical outcomes were documented daily and compared between groups. RESULTS No significant differences were observed between the two groups in selected laboratory and inflammatory parameters, or in their net change, before and after treatment. AEs and clinical outcomes, including infectious complications, overall complications, time to first bowel action, and length of hospital stay after surgery, were comparable between treatment groups (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION Immune-modulating nutrient-enriched EN had no prominent immunomodulation effect compared with that of standard EN.
-
7.
Enteral immunonutrition versus enteral nutrition for gastric cancer patients undergoing a total gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cheng, Y, Zhang, J, Zhang, L, Wu, J, Zhan, Z
BMC gastroenterology. 2018;(1):11
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nutrition support is a common means for patients with gastric cancer, especially for those undergoing elective surgery. Recently, enteral immunonutrition (EIN) was increasingly found to be more effective than enteral nutrition (EN) in enhancing the host immunity and eventually improving the prognosis of gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy. However, the results reported were not consistent. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of EIN for patients with GC on biochemical, immune indices and clinical outcomes. METHODS Four electronical databases (Medline, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane library) were used to search articles in peer-reviewed, English-language journals. Mean difference (MD), Relative risk (RR), or standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed by Cochrane Q and I2 statistic combined with corresponding P-value. The analysis was carried out with RevMan 5.3. RESULTS Seven studies involving 583 patients were eligible for the pooled analysis. EIN, when beyond a 7-day time-frame post-operatively (D ≥ 7), increased level of CD4+ (SMD = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.65-1.33; P < 0.00001), CD4+/ CD8+ (SMD = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.02-0.67; P = 0.04), the IgM (SMD = 1.15; 95% CI, 0.11-2.20; P = 0.03), the IgG (SMD = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.55-1.42; P < 0.0001), the lymphocyte (SMD = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.32-1.06; P = 0.0003), and the proalbumin (SMD = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.33-1.14; P = 0.0004). However, those increased effects were not obvious within a 7-day time-frame post-operatively (D < 7). The levels of CD8+ and other serum proteins except proalbumin were not improved both on D ≥ 7 and D < 7. Clinical outcomes such as systemic inflammatory response syndrone (SIRS) (MD, - 0.89 days; 95% CI, - 1.40 to - 0.39; P = 0.005), and postoperative complications (RR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.14-0.60; P = 0.001) were significantly reduced in EIN group. Pulmonary infection and length of hospitalization (LHS) were not improved no matter what time after surgery. CONCLUSIONS EIN was found to improve the cellular immunity, modulate inflammatory reaction and reduce postoperative complication for GC patients undergoing radical gastrointestinal surgery. Exclusion of grey literature and non-English language studies was the key limitation in this study.
-
8.
Relationship between enteral nutrition and serum levels of inflammatory factors and cardiac function in elderly patients with heart failure.
Zhou, H, Qian, H
Clinical interventions in aging. 2018;:397-401
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate enteral nutrition's effect on serum inflammatory factors and the cardiac function of malnourished elderly patients with heart failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 105 elderly patients with heart failure were randomly divided into 3 groups: Treatment Group A, Treatment Group B, and the Control Group (Group C), each group having 35 patients and being administered conventional heart failure treatment. Group A was treated with 500 mL·d-1 of enteral nutrition for 1 month. Group B was given the same dose of enteral nutrition for 3 months. The Control Group was given free diet. Nutritional risk screening 2002 was used to assess the nutritional status before and after the treatment for each group. New York Heart Association status was recorded as were left ventricular ejection fraction, plasma B-type natriuretic peptide, inteleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and tumor necrosis factor-α. RESULTS After the treatment, the body mass index, skinfold thickness of upper arm triceps, muscle circumference of the upper arm, upper arm muscle circumference, total protein, albumin, hemoglobin, and left ventricular ejection fraction in the treatment groups all increased, with relatively obvious relief of symptoms of heart failure. The levels of B-type natriuretic peptide, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, and C-reactive protein all rose to different extents (P<0.05) and Treatment Group B showed more obvious improvement (P<0.01). Differences shown by the Control Group in each nutrition indicator, serum levels of inflammatory factors, and cardiac function had no statistical significance (P>0.05). CONCLUSION The use of enteral nutrition in conventional treatment of elderly patients with heart failure could improve not only patients' nutritional status and cardiac function, but also their immune function, thus reducing the levels of inflammatory factors. The longer the treatment period is, the more obvious the improvement in patients' cardiac function and inflammatory factors will be observed.
-
9.
The intensive care medicine research agenda in nutrition and metabolism.
Arabi, YM, Casaer, MP, Chapman, M, Heyland, DK, Ichai, C, Marik, PE, Martindale, RG, McClave, SA, Preiser, JC, Reignier, J, et al
Intensive care medicine. 2017;(9):1239-1256
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
PURPOSE The objectives of this review are to summarize the current practices and major recent advances in critical care nutrition and metabolism, review common beliefs that have been contradicted by recent trials, highlight key remaining areas of uncertainty, and suggest recommendations for the top 10 studies/trials to be done in the next 10 years. METHODS Recent literature was reviewed and developments and knowledge gaps were summarized. The panel identified candidate topics for future trials in critical care nutrition and metabolism. Then, members of the panel rated each one of the topics using a grading system (0-4). Potential studies were ranked on the basis of average score. RESULTS Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have challenged several concepts, including the notion that energy expenditure must be met universally in all critically ill patients during the acute phase of critical illness, the routine monitoring of gastric residual volume, and the value of immune-modulating nutrition. The optimal protein dose combined with standardized active and passive mobilization during the acute phase and post-acute phase of critical illness were the top ranked studies for the next 10 years. Nutritional assessment, nutritional strategies in critically obese patients, and the effects of continuous versus intermittent enteral nutrition were also among the highest-ranking studies. CONCLUSIONS Priorities for clinical research in the field of nutritional management of critically ill patients were suggested, with the prospect that different nutritional interventions targeted to the appropriate patient population will be examined for their effect on facilitating recovery and improving survival in adequately powered and properly designed studies, probably in conjunction with physical activity.
-
10.
Is preoperative protein-rich nutrition effective on postoperative outcome in non-small cell lung cancer surgery? A prospective randomized study.
Kaya, SO, Akcam, TI, Ceylan, KC, Samancılar, O, Ozturk, O, Usluer, O
Journal of cardiothoracic surgery. 2016;:14
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Protein-rich nutrition is necessary for wound healing after surgery. In this study, the benefit of preoperative nutritional support was investigated for non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent anatomic resection. METHODS A prospective study was planned with the approval of our institutional review board. Fifty-eight patients who underwent anatomic resection in our department between January 2014 and December 2014 were randomized. Thirty-one patients were applied a preoperative nutrition program with immune modulating formulae (enriched with arginine, omega-3 fatty acids and nucleotides) for ten days. There were 27 patients in the control group who were fed with only normal diet. Patients who were malnourished, diabetic or who had undergone bronchoplastic procedures or neoadjuvant therapy were excluded from the study. Patients' baseline serum albumin levels, defined as the serum albumin level before any nutrition program, and the serum albumin levels on the postoperative third day were calculated and recorded with the other data. RESULTS Anatomic resection was performed by thoracotomy in 20 patients, and 11 patients were operated by videothoracoscopy in the nutrition program group. On the other hand 16 patients were operated by thoracotomy and 11 patients were operated by videothoracoscopy in the control group. In the control group, the patients' albumin levels decreased to 25.71 % of the baseline on the postoperative third day, but this reduction was only 14.69 % for nutrition program group patients and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Complications developed in 12 patients (44.4 %) in the control group compared to 6 patients in the nutrition group (p = 0.049). The mean chest tube drainage time was 6 (1-42) days in the control group against 4 (2-15) days for the nutrition program group (p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS Our study showed that preoperative nutrition is beneficial in decreasing the complications and chest tube removal time in non-small cell lung cancer patients that were applied anatomic resection with a reduction of 25 % in the postoperative albumin levels of non-malnourished patients who underwent resection.