Effects of oral ingestion of sucralose on gut hormone response and appetite in healthy normal-weight subjects.

European journal of clinical nutrition. 2011;65(4):508-13

Plain language summary

There have been significant advances in the understanding of how hormonal signals released from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract interact with circuits within the central nervous system to control appetite and energy intake. The aim of this study is to investigate whether oral ingestion of sucralose, at a dose that would be consumed in a normal diet, increases circulating gut hormones (glucagon-like peptide [GLP-1] or peptide YY [PYY] concentrations in man. This study is a randomised, single-blinded, crossover design study. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive one of four solutions on four separate study sessions. Eight normal-weight, healthy volunteers were recruited, all of which were non-smokers, aged 22–27 years (seven females and one male) with a stable body weight. Results indicate that oral ingestion of the artificial sweetener sucralose does not increase plasma GLP-1 or PYY concentrations nor does it affect subjective feelings of appetite or energy intake at the next meal in healthy volunteers. Based on their findings, authors conclude that a dietary dose of sucralose does not stimulate the sweet-taste receptor in the GI tract to release GLP-1 and PYY.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE The sweet-taste receptor (T1r2+T1r3) is expressed by enteroendocrine L-cells throughout the gastrointestinal tract. Application of sucralose (a non-calorific, non-metabolisable sweetener) to L-cells in vitro stimulates glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 secretion, an effect that is inhibited with co-administration of a T1r2+T1r3 inhibitor. We conducted a randomised, single-blinded, crossover study in eight healthy subjects to investigate whether oral ingestion of sucralose could stimulate L-cell-derived GLP-1 and peptide YY (PYY) release in vivo. METHODS Fasted subjects were studied on 4 study days in random order. Subjects consumed 50 ml of either water, sucralose (0.083% w/v), a non-sweet, glucose-polymer matched for sweetness with sucralose addition (50% w/v maltodextrin+0.083% sucralose) or a modified sham-feeding protocol (MSF=oral stimulation) of sucralose (0.083% w/v). Appetite ratings and plasma GLP-1, PYY, insulin and glucose were measured at regular time points for 120 min. At 120 min, energy intake at a buffet meal was measured. RESULTS Sucralose ingestion did not increase plasma GLP-1 or PYY. MSF of sucralose did not elicit a cephalic phase response for insulin or GLP-1. Maltodextrin ingestion significantly increased insulin and glucose compared with water (P<0.001). Appetite ratings and energy intake were similar for all groups. CONCLUSIONS At this dose, oral ingestion of sucralose does not increase plasma GLP-1 or PYY concentrations and hence, does not reduce appetite in healthy subjects. Oral stimulation with sucralose had no effect on GLP-1, insulin or appetite.

Lifestyle medicine

Fundamental Clinical Imbalances : Hormonal ; Digestive, absorptive and microbiological
Patient Centred Factors : Triggers/Sucralose
Environmental Inputs : Diet ; Nutrients
Personal Lifestyle Factors : Nutrition ; Psychological
Functional Laboratory Testing : Blood

Methodological quality

Jadad score : 3
Allocation concealment : Yes

Metadata