Physical activity and the risk of heart failure: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, Paddington, London, W2 1PG, UK. d.aune@imperial.ac.uk. Department of Nutrition, Bjørknes University College, Oslo, Norway. d.aune@imperial.ac.uk. Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway. d.aune@imperial.ac.uk. Institute for Biometry and Epidemiology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Institute for Diabetes Research at the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany. Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, Paddington, London, W2 1PG, UK. Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

European journal of epidemiology. 2021;(4):367-381

Abstract

Although physical activity is an established protective factor for cardiovascular diseases such as ischemic heart disease and stroke, less is known with regard to the association between specific domains of physical activity and heart failure, as well as the association between cardiorespiratory fitness and heart failure. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies to clarify the relations of total physical activity, domains of physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness to risk of heart failure. PubMed and Embase databases were searched up to January 14th, 2020. Summary relative risks (RRs) were calculated using random effects models. Twenty-nine prospective studies (36 publications) were included in the review. The summary RRs for high versus low levels were 0.77 (95% CI 0.70-0.85, I2 = 49%, n = 7) for total physical activity, 0.74 (95% CI 0.68-0.81, I2 = 88.1%, n = 16) for leisure-time activity, 0.66 (95% CI 0.59-0.74, I2 = 0%, n = 2) for vigorous activity, 0.81 (95% CI 0.69-0.94, I2 = 86%, n = 3) for walking and bicycling combined, 0.90 (95% CI 0.86-0.95, I2 = 0%, n = 3) for occupational activity, and 0.31 (95% CI 0.19-0.49, I2 = 96%, n = 6) for cardiorespiratory fitness. In dose-response analyses, the summary RRs were 0.89 (95% CI 0.83-0.95, I2 = 67%, n = 4) per 20 MET-hours per day of total activity and 0.71 (95% CI 0.65-0.78, I2 = 85%, n = 11) per 20 MET-hours per week of leisure-time activity. Nonlinear associations were observed in both analyses with a flattening of the dose-response curve at 15-20 MET-hours/week for leisure-time activity. These findings suggest that high levels of total physical activity, leisure-time activity, vigorous activity, occupational activity, walking and bicycling combined and cardiorespiratory fitness are associated with reduced risk of developing heart failure.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Meta-Analysis ; Review

Metadata

MeSH terms : Exercise ; Heart Failure ; Walking