Plain language summary
Disease caused by the novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is currently the most serious public health issue. Factors such as the presence of comorbidities, greater propensity for systemic organ dysfunction, and poor nutritional status can contribute to the heightened risk of clinical complications in older adults with COVID-19. The aim of this study was to identify the screening instruments that can be used to assess nutritional risk in older adults with COVID-19, and to clarify their measurement properties. This study is a systemic review of four studies which were conducted in China. Results demonstrate that nutritional risk was highly prevalent among older adults with COVID-19 regardless of the nutritional screening tool applied. Nutritional screening and assessment tools can contribute to the early diagnosis of people with greater nutritional risk, considering their convenience, low cost, and good ability to predict clinical outcomes. Authors conclude that identifying risk using instruments with adequate sensitivity can help prevent worsening disease and improve patients’ prognoses.
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with high risk of malnutrition, primarily in older people; assessing nutritional risk using appropriate screening tools is critical. This systematic review identified applicable tools and assessed their measurement properties. Literature was searched in the MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS databases. Four studies conducted in China met the eligibility criteria. Sample sizes ranged from six to 182, and participants' ages from 65 to 87 years. Seven nutritional screening and assessment tools were used: the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002), the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), the MNA-short form (MNA-sf), the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), the Nutritional Risk Index (NRI), the Geriatric NRI (GNRI), and modified Nutrition Risk in the Critically ill (mNUTRIC) score. Nutritional risk was identified in 27.5% to 100% of participants. The NRS-2002, MNA, MNA-sf, NRI, and MUST demonstrated high sensitivity; the MUST had better specificity. The MNA and MUST demonstrated better criterion validity. The MNA-sf demonstrated better predictive validity for poor appetite and weight loss; the NRS-2002 demonstrated better predictive validity for prolonged hospitalization. mNUTRIC score demonstrated good predictive validity for hospital mortality. Most instruments demonstrate high sensitivity for identifying nutritional risk, but none are acknowledged as the best for nutritional screening in older adults with COVID-19.
Methodological quality
Jadad score
:
Not applicable
Allocation concealment
:
Not applicable
