Plain language summary
Infertility has been identified by the World Health Organization as a worldwide problem. The analysis of semen quality is key in assessing male fertility. The aim of this study was to explore the effect of healthy dietary patterns on male semen quality. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of six articles. The six articles were cross-sectional studies involving 1244 subjects, however, 708 subjects with the lowest and highest adherence to a healthy dietary pattern were included in the meta-analysis. Results show that the sperm concentration, progressive sperm motility, and total sperm count were significantly higher in the group with high consumption of a healthy dietary pattern than those in the group with low consumption; however, there wasn’t a clear relationship between normal sperm morphology, total sperm motility, and semen volume. Authors conclude that dietary interventions should be considered in clinical work as part of the therapies improving male semen quality.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- This Systematic Review and Meta Analysis showed that healthy dietary patterns had beneficial effects on sperm concentration, total sperm count, and progressive sperm motility in males, which affect male fertility.
- Authors concluded that healthy dietary patterns may promote male reproductive health and thus improve semen quality in the population.
- Healthy dietary patterns meant the Mediterranean diet for 4 out of 6 studies. All healthy diet patterns were determined by the authors to be rich in plant-based foods, where saturated fats provide only a small percentage of the total energy intake.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
- This study aimed to determine the effects of healthy dietary patterns on semen quality.
Methodology
- This meta-analysis was performed following PRISMA guidelines and included 6 cross-sectional studies with 1244 participants
- The included cross-sectional studies examined the influence of the Mediterranean, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), and prudent diet patterns on semen quality parameters.
- In 4 of the studies participants were divided into groups based on their scores for the Mediterranean diet from low to high adherence.
- 2 studies examined the DASH diet and the prudent diet and used food frequency questionnaires to compare high consumption with low consumption of healthy dietary patterns.
- The PICOS (Participants, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study design) criteria that were used to structure the research question.
- 11 Checklists were used to assess the quality of included studies.
Results:
By comparing high consumption with low consumption of healthy dietary patterns, the results of the meta-analysis showed:
- significantly higher sperm concentrations (mean difference [MD] = 6.88 × 106 ml−1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26 × 106 ml−1–12.49 × 106 ml−1; P < 0.05)
- significant increase in total sperm count (MD = 16.70 × 106, 95% CI: 2.37 × 106–31.03 × 106; P < 0.05)
- significant increase in progressive sperm motility (MD = 5.85%, 95% CI: 2.59%–9.12%; P < 0.01) but there was no significant correlation between healthy dietary patterns and total sperm motility (MD: 6.86%, 95% CI: −0.25%–13.96%; P > 0.05).
- there was no significant association between a healthy dietary pattern and normal sperm morphology (MD: 0.28%, 95% CI: −0.33%–0.90%; P > 0.05)
- there was no significant association between a healthy dietary pattern and semen volume (MD: 0.04 ml, 95% CI: −0.20 ml–0.28 ml; P > 0.05).
Limitations:
- Included studies were all cross-sectional studies, and it is impossible to determine the causal relationship between the high intake of healthy dietary patterns and semen quality.
- The number of studies included was small, and there was not enough literature to support authors in drawing reliable conclusions.
- No comparison was made between specific diets such as dash vs Mediterranean.
Clinical practice applications:
- The authors concluded that dietary interventions should be considered in clinical work as part of the therapies improving male semen quality.
- Dietary interventions for men should be included as part of preconceptional clinical management,
- Dietary interventions for men should also be considered in infertility clinical management.
Considerations for future research:
- Randomised Clinical Trials should be conducted to build on these findings.
Abstract
The incidence of infertility has recently risen. Semen quality is an important male fertility indicator, and dietary factors can affect semen quality. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effects of healthy dietary patterns on semen quality. A literature search was conducted in 3 databases (Embase, Web of Science and PubMed) on August 21, 2021. The included cross-sectional studies examined the influence of the Mediterranean, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), and prudent diet patterns on semen quality parameters; six studies (1244 subjects) were included. By comparing high consumption with low consumption of healthy dietary patterns, the results of the meta-analysis showed significantly higher sperm concentrations (mean difference [MD] = 6.88 × 106 ml-1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26 × 106 ml-1-12.49 × 106 ml-1; P < 0.05), a significant increase in total sperm count (MD = 16.70 × 106, 95% CI: 2.37 × 106-31.03 × 106; P < 0.05), and a significant increase in progressive sperm motility (MD = 5.85%, 95% CI: 2.59%-9.12%; P < 0.01). The sperm concentration, progressive sperm motility, and total sperm count were significantly higher in men with higher versus lower consumption of healthy dietary patterns. However, the results must be interpreted with caution.
Methodological quality
Jadad score
:
Not applicable
Allocation concealment
:
Not applicable
