Plain language summary
Poor dietary quality is well established as a potentially modifiable risk factor for mental disorders. The NOVA food classification system was recently developed to enable the categorisation of food items based on distinctive levels of processing. The aim of this study was to synthesise and provide quantitative analyses of the most up-to-date evidence assessing associations between consumption of ultra-processed food, as defined by the NOVA food classification system, and mental disorders. This study is systematic review and meta-analysis of 17 studies with a total of 385,541 participants. The studies were 15 cross-sectional and 2 prospectively designed studies. Results show that ultra-processed food consumption is bidirectionally associated with adverse mental health. In fact, greater intake of ultra-processed food was associated with increased odds of depressive and anxiety symptoms, both when these outcomes were assessed together as well as separately. Authors conclude that further prospective and experimental studies are required to better determine directionality and causality and ensure that global preventative and treatment strategies are efficacious and appropriate.
Abstract
Since previous meta-analyses, which were limited only to depression and by a small number of studies available for inclusion at the time of publication, several additional studies have been published assessing the link between ultra-processed food consumption and depression as well as other mental disorders. We aimed to build on previously conducted reviews to synthesise and meta-analyse the contemporary evidence base and clarify the associations between the consumption of ultra-processed food and mental disorders. A total of 17 observational studies were included (n = 385,541); 15 cross-sectional and 2 prospective. Greater ultra-processed food consumption was cross-sectionally associated with increased odds of depressive and anxiety symptoms, both when these outcomes were assessed together (common mental disorder symptoms odds ratio: 1.53, 95%CI 1.43 to 1.63) as well as separately (depressive symptoms odds ratio: 1.44, 95%CI 1.14 to 1.82; and, anxiety symptoms odds ratio: 1.48, 95%CI 1.37 to 1.59). Furthermore, a meta-analysis of prospective studies demonstrated that greater ultra-processed food intake was associated with increased risk of subsequent depression (hazard ratio: 1.22, 95%CI 1.16 to 1.28). While we found evidence for associations between ultra-processed food consumption and adverse mental health, further rigorously designed prospective and experimental studies are needed to better understand causal pathways.
Methodological quality
Jadad score
:
Not applicable
Allocation concealment
:
Not applicable
